2021
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.3047108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Domain Alignment Embedding Network for Sketch Face Recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the first two setup, performance of the CTMAN with the CTMAN*, CTMAN-ResNet18, PCA (Turk, 1991), ET(+PCA) (Tang and Wang, 2004), EP(+PCA) (Galea and Farrugia, 2015), LLE(+PCA) (Chang et al, 2004), CBR (Hu et al, 2013), D-RS (Klare and Jain, 2015), CBR+D-RS (Klare and Jain, 2015), LGMS (Galea and Farrugia, 2016), HAOG (Galoogahi and Sim, 2012), VGG-Face (Parkhi et al, 2015), DEEPS (Galea and Farrugia, 2018), Xu's (Xu et al, 2021), DLFace (Peng et al, 2019), SSR (Peng et al, 2021), andDAEN (Guo et al, 2021) methods are reported in Tables 5, 6. The performance of these compared approaches is directly from Galea and Farrugia (2018), Xu et al (2021), Peng et al (2019), Peng et al (2021), andGuo et al (2021). The extended gallery set in Galea and Farrugia (2018) consists of part images of the FEI, MEDS-II, Multi-PIE (Gross et al, 2010), and FRGC v2.0 4 datasets, these images are frontal and have high quality.…”
Section: Comparison To the State-of-the-art Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…For the first two setup, performance of the CTMAN with the CTMAN*, CTMAN-ResNet18, PCA (Turk, 1991), ET(+PCA) (Tang and Wang, 2004), EP(+PCA) (Galea and Farrugia, 2015), LLE(+PCA) (Chang et al, 2004), CBR (Hu et al, 2013), D-RS (Klare and Jain, 2015), CBR+D-RS (Klare and Jain, 2015), LGMS (Galea and Farrugia, 2016), HAOG (Galoogahi and Sim, 2012), VGG-Face (Parkhi et al, 2015), DEEPS (Galea and Farrugia, 2018), Xu's (Xu et al, 2021), DLFace (Peng et al, 2019), SSR (Peng et al, 2021), andDAEN (Guo et al, 2021) methods are reported in Tables 5, 6. The performance of these compared approaches is directly from Galea and Farrugia (2018), Xu et al (2021), Peng et al (2019), Peng et al (2021), andGuo et al (2021). The extended gallery set in Galea and Farrugia (2018) consists of part images of the FEI, MEDS-II, Multi-PIE (Gross et al, 2010), and FRGC v2.0 4 datasets, these images are frontal and have high quality.…”
Section: Comparison To the State-of-the-art Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the fourth setup, the performance of the CTMAN with the SSD (Mittal et al, 2014), Attribute (Mittal et al, 2017), Transfer Learning (Mittal et al, 2015), and DAEN (Guo et al, 2021 methods are reported in Table 8. The performance of these compared approaches are directly from Mittal et al (2015), Mittal et al (2017), andGuo et al (2021). The SSD and Attribute are traditional methods, whereas Transfer Learning and DAEN are deep learning methods.…”
Section: Comparison To the State-of-the-art Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations