2022
DOI: 10.1007/s13349-022-00565-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Domain-adapted Gaussian mixture models for population-based structural health monitoring

Abstract: Transfer learning, in the form of domain adaptation, seeks to overcome challenges associated with a lack of available health-state data for a structure, which severely limits the effectiveness of conventional machine learning approaches to structural health monitoring (SHM). These technologies utilise labelled information across a population of structures (and physics-based models), such that inferences are improved, either for the complete population, or for particular target structures — enabling a populatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, a given metric can give an indication of the type of features present in a signal without manual inspection. The results presented here using the simulated dataset are satisfactory pointers towards generalisation, because in a population-based setting -particularly within a homogeneous population where the behaviour of the data within a given window is assumed to be the same/very similar (Even in heterogenous population examples, feature similarity is important to avoid negative transfer 23,26 ) -the metrics will not identify differences between general trends as D(x, y) = 0 when x = y. As a result, the metrics are expected to identify behaviours/features that are anomalous to the general population trends.…”
Section: The Response Of the Metrics To Changes In Amplitude And Meanmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As a result, a given metric can give an indication of the type of features present in a signal without manual inspection. The results presented here using the simulated dataset are satisfactory pointers towards generalisation, because in a population-based setting -particularly within a homogeneous population where the behaviour of the data within a given window is assumed to be the same/very similar (Even in heterogenous population examples, feature similarity is important to avoid negative transfer 23,26 ) -the metrics will not identify differences between general trends as D(x, y) = 0 when x = y. As a result, the metrics are expected to identify behaviours/features that are anomalous to the general population trends.…”
Section: The Response Of the Metrics To Changes In Amplitude And Meanmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Methods such as normal condition alignment (that standardises and aligns data when structures are under normal operating condition) has proven incredibly useful for PBSHM in transferring knowledge across structures. 22,23 Therefore, the behaviour of metrics as data are standardised is an important consideration for testing their effectiveness for PBSHM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…f. Ultimately, the choice of motion tracking method depends on the specific requirements of the application and the trade-offs between accuracy, computational complexity, and robustness. According to statistics, GMM is one of the most used statistical models and is most commonly utilized when adaptive background subtraction in movies is needed [24]. When used in settings with relatively little background movement, this approach performs exceptionally well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 2: Proposed ModelGaussian Mixture Model (GMM) is one of the ways to get rid of the background. GMM models the time series of pixel values[23][24][25]. The accuracy of the Gaussian Mixture Models (GMM) method in separating the background and the tracked object can be evaluated using several metrics, such as: a. Intersection over Union (IoU): This metric measures the overlap between the predicted object bounding box and the ground truth bounding box, divided by their union.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%