1983
DOI: 10.1016/0014-2999(83)90196-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DOM-stimulus generalization to LSD and other hallucinogenic indolealkylamines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
31
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
4
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based upon those reports and the previously described cross-generalization of hallucinogens in rats (Winter and Rabin, 1988;Glennon et al 1983), we would expect DPT to substitute for LSD, psilocybin and MDMA. The data of Figures 3 -5 only partially fulfill that prediction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based upon those reports and the previously described cross-generalization of hallucinogens in rats (Winter and Rabin, 1988;Glennon et al 1983), we would expect DPT to substitute for LSD, psilocybin and MDMA. The data of Figures 3 -5 only partially fulfill that prediction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The discriminative stimulus properties of hallucinogens such as mescaline, DOI and LSD have been extensively investigated in several different animal species and it has been shown that, in agreement with studies in humans, these drugs generalize with one another (Winter, 1978;Glennon et al, 1983;Fiorella et al, 1995a). Furthermore, antagonist correlation analysis has determined that the stimulus effects of phenylisopropylamine and indolealkylamine hallucinogens are mediated by agonist activity at 5-HT 2A receptors (Fiorella et al, 1995b) and possibly modulated by agonist activity at 5-HT 2C (Fiorella et al, 1995c) and 5-HT 1A (Reissig et al, 2005) receptors.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Because of these similarities, 5-MEO-DIPT likely binds to serotonin receptors, although if it binds to the serotonin transporter or other receptor systems is unknown. In support of this hypothesis, 5-MEO-DIPT has been shown to generalize to 1-(2,5-dimethoxy-4-methyphenyl)-2-aminopropane (Glennon et al, 1983), another Schedule I hallucinogen that binds to subtypes of the 5-HT 2 receptor (Eckler et al, 2003). The cataleptic states observed subsequent to 5-MEO-DIPT administration are also associated with 5-HT 2 agonists.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The lower lip retraction produced by 5-MeO-DMT, however, is thought to be due to the activation of 5-HT 1A rather than 5-HT 2 receptors because it is only produced by 5-HT 1A agonists, such as 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin (8-OH-DPAT) (Berendsen et al 1989). In tests of drug discrimination, 5-MeO-DMT was shown to generalize to other hallucinogens, such as LSD, DOM, DMT, and mescaline (Glennon et al 1979(Glennon et al , 1980(Glennon et al , 1983Spencer et al 1987). This fact is not surprising because 5-MeO-DMT has demonstrated agonist activity for the 5-HT 2 receptors most commonly associated with hallucinogenic activity (Boulenguez et al 1991;Dumuis et al 1987;Glennon et al 1980Glennon et al , 1984McClue et al 1989;McKenna et al 1990;Titeler et al 1988).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%