2006
DOI: 10.1242/jeb.02405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dolphin continuous auditory vigilance for five days

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
46
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
9
46
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Sleep rebounds are highly variable in vertebrates and invertebrates, rarely meeting the homeostatic requirement of full compensation for sleep loss, and several instances of little or no response have been reported. Examples of the latter include male Drosophila (CS strain) after 6h of mechanical stimulation (Huber et al, 2004), zebrafish (Danio rerio) after 6h or 3 days of light-induced vigilance (Yokogawa et al, 2007), pigeons (Columba livia) following light-induced sleep deprivation (Tobler and Borbely, 1988;Berger and Phillips, 1994), golden-mantled ground squirrels (Spermophilus lateralis) following 3h of gentle handling during the post-hibernation period (Larkin and Heller, 1998), squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus) following up to 36h of mild disturbance (Klerman et al, 1999), bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncates) following up to 5 days of auditory vigilance (Ridgway et al, 2006), and rats (Rattus norvegicus), which lack a NREM sleep rebound following 4 days of sleep deprivation (Rechtschaffen et al, 1999). Regardless of whether these exceptions are interpreted as evidence against a sleep homeostatic mechanism (Siegel, 2009) or as evidence of a poorly designed study (Cirelli and Tononi, 2008), in no case did the authors of those papers conclude that the animals do not sleep at all; the existence of 'sleep' as a state is not dependent on the demonstration of a particular kind of regulatory mechanism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sleep rebounds are highly variable in vertebrates and invertebrates, rarely meeting the homeostatic requirement of full compensation for sleep loss, and several instances of little or no response have been reported. Examples of the latter include male Drosophila (CS strain) after 6h of mechanical stimulation (Huber et al, 2004), zebrafish (Danio rerio) after 6h or 3 days of light-induced vigilance (Yokogawa et al, 2007), pigeons (Columba livia) following light-induced sleep deprivation (Tobler and Borbely, 1988;Berger and Phillips, 1994), golden-mantled ground squirrels (Spermophilus lateralis) following 3h of gentle handling during the post-hibernation period (Larkin and Heller, 1998), squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus) following up to 36h of mild disturbance (Klerman et al, 1999), bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncates) following up to 5 days of auditory vigilance (Ridgway et al, 2006), and rats (Rattus norvegicus), which lack a NREM sleep rebound following 4 days of sleep deprivation (Rechtschaffen et al, 1999). Regardless of whether these exceptions are interpreted as evidence against a sleep homeostatic mechanism (Siegel, 2009) or as evidence of a poorly designed study (Cirelli and Tononi, 2008), in no case did the authors of those papers conclude that the animals do not sleep at all; the existence of 'sleep' as a state is not dependent on the demonstration of a particular kind of regulatory mechanism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Auditory goal tone response time (AGTRT) did not slow between day one and day five whereas AGTRT was slower during night time (21:00-04:00 h) compared with daytime (09:00-16:00 h). However, the dolphins were able to maintain levels of vigilance as indicated by reliable goal tone detection even during night time periods of slowed AGTRT when the animals appeared to be resting or sleeping (Ridgway et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…A previous study (Ridgway et al, 2006), reported for the first time that bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) could maintain auditory vigilance for 120 continuous hours. These animals showed no evidence of sleep rebound or health effects of sleep deprivation as indicated by behavior, blood indices or marked sleep rebound during 24 h of continuous post-experiment observation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…An increased number of glial cells in the cetacean brain, as seen herein when compared to artiodactyls, may result in an increased production of lactate. This extracellular lactate may be related to maintained arousal and attention during unihemispheric sleep (Ridgway et al, 2006(Ridgway et al, , 2009Branstetter et al, 2012), as extracellular lactate concentrations are higher during periods of wake (Pellerin and Magistretti, 1994). Furthermore lactate reduces extracellular pH levels and this is vital for arousal and attention, as orexinergic neurons are excited by a low pH (Williams et al, 2007;Parsons and Hirasawa, 2010).…”
Section: Orexinergic Bouton and Glial Cell Density Interaction In Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, it has been demonstrated that dolphins can continuously maintain vigilant behaviour for at least 15 days without any signs of sleep deprivation (Ridgway et al, 2006(Ridgway et al, , 2009Branstetter et al, 2012), an observation not made, but unlikely to be present in artiodactyls.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%