The Routledge Handbook of Comparative World Rhetorics 2020
DOI: 10.4324/9780367809768-43
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Doing Rhetoric Elsewhere

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since many other communities in the Global South share this ontology of nonduality, and epistemologies of relationality and embodiment, their literacies are also different from the graphocentric tradition (see Baca, 2009; García & Baca, 2019; Lyons, 2000). Knowledge can be represented by notches on strings (i.e., Quipus, as practiced by many ancient communities in Andes, and used by Incas to keep records for their empire 1100 AD onward); etching or painting in caves (as done by prehistoric aborigines everywhere); smoke patterns (as used on the Great Wall to protect ancient China since 220 BC); inscriptions on elevated rocks (i.e., “rune stones,” as done by Vikings in Scandinavia since 4th century AD or in Tamil kingdoms from 5th century BCE); drawing of local knowledge, memories, or information on bodies, trees, and on the ground (i.e., “dreaming” by the aborigines in Australia, with those from 60000 years ago now identified); the hieroglyphics in which the characters were pictures sculpted in stone in 1st century BCE Egypt; the different traditions and cultural meanings in the calligraphy of Arabic from medieval times; and inscription of knowledge and values in masks and functional artifacts in precolonial sub‐Saharan Africa.…”
Section: Indigenous Literaciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since many other communities in the Global South share this ontology of nonduality, and epistemologies of relationality and embodiment, their literacies are also different from the graphocentric tradition (see Baca, 2009; García & Baca, 2019; Lyons, 2000). Knowledge can be represented by notches on strings (i.e., Quipus, as practiced by many ancient communities in Andes, and used by Incas to keep records for their empire 1100 AD onward); etching or painting in caves (as done by prehistoric aborigines everywhere); smoke patterns (as used on the Great Wall to protect ancient China since 220 BC); inscriptions on elevated rocks (i.e., “rune stones,” as done by Vikings in Scandinavia since 4th century AD or in Tamil kingdoms from 5th century BCE); drawing of local knowledge, memories, or information on bodies, trees, and on the ground (i.e., “dreaming” by the aborigines in Australia, with those from 60000 years ago now identified); the hieroglyphics in which the characters were pictures sculpted in stone in 1st century BCE Egypt; the different traditions and cultural meanings in the calligraphy of Arabic from medieval times; and inscription of knowledge and values in masks and functional artifacts in precolonial sub‐Saharan Africa.…”
Section: Indigenous Literaciesmentioning
confidence: 99%