2019
DOI: 10.1017/s1743923x1900045x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Doing Politics Differently? Applying a Feminist Institutionalist Lens to the U.K. Women's Equality Party

Abstract: The UK Women's Equality Party (WEP) was established in 2015 in order to 'bring about change by winning -support, votes and seats'. It has thus far recruited tens of thousands of members and run candidates in national, devolved and local elections. This article provides one of the first empirical analyses of this new actor in UK politics. Adopting a feminist institutionalist lens we examine the extent to which WEP 'does things differently' by looking at discourse, formal party rules and informal ways of doing t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A feminist SI perspective enables the exploration of the macro and micro levels of change from conformity with traditional institutional gender norms and practices (DiMaggio and Powel, 1991), so that one can interrogate the level and extent of the impact of gender integration processes. Changes at the macro levels are often readily and directly associated with formal rules (Bjarnegård and Kenny 2016;Evans and Kenny 2020), whereas the gendered perceptions of individuals at the micro level, go a long way to influence "how things are done" within the institution (Lowndes, 2014, 685). Therefore, micro perspectives, even if they go unnoticed for a while, have gendered consequences (Bjarnegård and Kenny 2016).…”
Section: A Feminist Sociological Institutionalist Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A feminist SI perspective enables the exploration of the macro and micro levels of change from conformity with traditional institutional gender norms and practices (DiMaggio and Powel, 1991), so that one can interrogate the level and extent of the impact of gender integration processes. Changes at the macro levels are often readily and directly associated with formal rules (Bjarnegård and Kenny 2016;Evans and Kenny 2020), whereas the gendered perceptions of individuals at the micro level, go a long way to influence "how things are done" within the institution (Lowndes, 2014, 685). Therefore, micro perspectives, even if they go unnoticed for a while, have gendered consequences (Bjarnegård and Kenny 2016).…”
Section: A Feminist Sociological Institutionalist Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This points to the feedback loop associated with the link between practices at the micro level and formal rules introduced at the macro level. According to Evans and Kenny (2020), individual action which are in line with formal rules, can reinforce institutional changes at the macro level. This shows that the impact of formal rules that are initiated to change gender perceptions and attain gender equality, is dependent on changes to individual practices at the micro-level.…”
Section: A Feminist Sociological Institutionalist Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They have provided insights into how institutional policy making and agenda-setting is influenced by and perpetuates gender biases. For example, scholars have shown how gendered practices in institutions affect and often hamper the representation of women in politics and the implementation of gender mainstreaming policies (Evans and Kenny 2020;Bjarnegard and Kenny 2016). At the same time, seeing gender as a key structuring aspect of institutions also opens spaces for feminist actors to "re-gender" institutions and promote gender equality.…”
Section: Inter-institutional Counterterrorism Reform As Gendered Meaning-makingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our limited knowledge of women's parties relies on individual case studies (Cowell-Meyers 2011, 2017; Dominelli and Jonsdottir 1988; Evans and Kenny 2019a; Krupavicius and Matonyte 2003; Levin 1999; Racioppi and See 1995; Slater 1995; Zaborszky 1987), with only a couple of comparative analyses (Cowell-Meyers 2016; Ishiyama 2003). To enhance our understanding of women's political parties, we offer the first comprehensive effort to document and analyze women's parties and then propose a comparative research framework for their analysis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%