2012
DOI: 10.4324/9780203831397
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Doing Multicultural Education for Achievement and Equity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
93
0
7

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
93
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Progressivism required that the students' knowledge, interests and abilities inform the teacher who listens and learns from them, co-constructing the sequencing and pace of instruction within all subjects being taught. In contemporary terms, progressive practices have led to a more critical pedagogical approach which holds that "what works" for disadvantaged students, often students from minority cultures and races" actually works for all students, while culturally insensitive curriculum, that is, colorblind and objective practices, do not work for minoritized groups of students (Grant and Sleeter 2011). Moving from constructivism to critical constructivism has become one of today's curricular challenges inside the academy.…”
Section: An Historical Convergencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Progressivism required that the students' knowledge, interests and abilities inform the teacher who listens and learns from them, co-constructing the sequencing and pace of instruction within all subjects being taught. In contemporary terms, progressive practices have led to a more critical pedagogical approach which holds that "what works" for disadvantaged students, often students from minority cultures and races" actually works for all students, while culturally insensitive curriculum, that is, colorblind and objective practices, do not work for minoritized groups of students (Grant and Sleeter 2011). Moving from constructivism to critical constructivism has become one of today's curricular challenges inside the academy.…”
Section: An Historical Convergencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Be willing to embrace the belief that every student can succeed may encounter challenges from cultural capital. Cultural capital can be described as the cultural knowledge of upper status groups in society (Young, as cited in Grant & Sleeter, 2011). It also refers to what Giroux (1981) illustrated as the socially determined tastes, certain kinds of prior knowledge, language forms, abilities, and modes of knowing that were unevenly distributed throughout society (p. 77).…”
Section: Culturally Responsive Teachers As Warm Demandersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also refers to what Giroux (1981) illustrated as the socially determined tastes, certain kinds of prior knowledge, language forms, abilities, and modes of knowing that were unevenly distributed throughout society (p. 77). As Grant and Sleeter (2011) stated, acquiring cultural capital, or high-status knowledge, usually required money or access to places where it was available.…”
Section: Culturally Responsive Teachers As Warm Demandersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nor was any knowledge cited of pedagogies which emphasize equity and justice and which focus on inequitable power relationships among groups (Nieto, 2004;Sleeter & Grant, 2003;Grant & Sleeter, 2007). Seminal publications on multicultural art education (Boughton & Mason, 1999;Chalmers, 1996) were unknown to the teachers.…”
Section: Understandings Of Multiculturalism and Multicultural Pedagogiesmentioning
confidence: 99%