2021
DOI: 10.1201/9781003107347
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Doing Meta-Analysis with R

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
1,110
0
5

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,032 publications
(1,117 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
1,110
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The numerical variables considered for the meta-analysis included mean and standard deviations of levels of hemoglobin, absorbed iron, and serum ferritin. The data were then entered into an Excel sheet as per the guidelines ( 12 , 13 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The numerical variables considered for the meta-analysis included mean and standard deviations of levels of hemoglobin, absorbed iron, and serum ferritin. The data were then entered into an Excel sheet as per the guidelines ( 12 , 13 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A meta-analysis was conducted using R Studio 4.0.4 (2021) ( www.rstudio.com ) to obtain a forest plot, heterogeneity, overall test effects in both fixed and random effect models, and funnel plots to determine the publication bias ( 12 , 23 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To detect an influential trial, the Cook's distance, a wellestablished influential point detection method, was used (60). A trial may be considered as an influential case if the Cook's distance is >0.45 (17). Supplementary Figure 1 shows the Cook's distance for each measure in the meta-analyses, with the potential influential study highlighted in red.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measurements in cTn, CK-MB, LVEF, and LOS were treated as the continuous variables with reported means and SDs, while the incidence of POAF was treated as a dichotomous variable. Instead of applying the fixed effects models, which operate under the assumption that the estimated effects across the studies were pulled from a single population, we employed the random effects models to calculate the pooled effects, as the true effect may derive from a distribution, due to the fact that multiple studies were pulled from the different populations (17). The Sidik-Jonkman estimator was used for estimating the variance of the distribution of the true effect (18).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another potential issue for the meta-analysis is the publication bias due to the trials with a small sample size (17). We checked the small-study effects using the funnel plots, which display the relationship between the SMD of studies against its standard error (61).…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%