2008
DOI: 10.1163/9789087904197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Doing Inclusive Education Research

Abstract: This series addresses the many different forms of exclusion that occur in schooling across a range of international contexts and considers strategies for increasing the inclusion and success of all students. In many school jurisdictions the most reliable predictors of schools have not been pressed to deal with exclusion and failure. Failing and difficult to manage students were blamed for their lack of attainment and were either placed in segregated educational settings or encouraged to leave and enter the uns… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies define inclusion as a new way of educating pupils with disabilities and a new form of education for all learners (Slee, 2014;Kiuppis, 2014). How inclusion should be implemented is not fully explained, however, and there is no clear definition of the concept (Allan, 2014;Allan & Slee, 2008;Ainscow, Booth, & Dyson, 2006). The definitions that exist derive from policy-and culture-driven interpretations (Engsig & Johnstone, 2014;Smith, 2014;Schwab et al, 2015;Sharma, Loreman, & Macanawai, 2016).…”
Section: Inclusive Education As a Complex And Contextual Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies define inclusion as a new way of educating pupils with disabilities and a new form of education for all learners (Slee, 2014;Kiuppis, 2014). How inclusion should be implemented is not fully explained, however, and there is no clear definition of the concept (Allan, 2014;Allan & Slee, 2008;Ainscow, Booth, & Dyson, 2006). The definitions that exist derive from policy-and culture-driven interpretations (Engsig & Johnstone, 2014;Smith, 2014;Schwab et al, 2015;Sharma, Loreman, & Macanawai, 2016).…”
Section: Inclusive Education As a Complex And Contextual Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Th e fi rst of our references is consistent with the broad international agreement on the need to consider that IE does not depend on, nor will it be achieved by, simply improving or increasing participation and collaboration of professionals and stakeholders within schools, but rather between schools and their communities. Also, the grounding in participative action research attempts to answer the assumed need to consider inclusion as a process that should not be built as a technology (Allan & Slee, 2008), but rather as an on-going process that needs to be undertaken, considering the voice, the thinking and the action of those engaged in it. Th e participatory action research approach assists participants in critically investigating their reality, analysing it and then undertaking constructive changes.…”
Section: Research General Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Th e overall study was designed to follow the previous assumptions, based on requirements of participative and inclusive research (Allan & Slee, 2008), which attempts to develop research initiatives using democratic and collaborative research approaches (Hansen, Ramstad, Richter, Smith & Stratton, 2001;Nind, 2014). Furthermore, the study was particularly focused on researching and improving education from the local and community perspective.…”
Section: The Research Process: Design Data Recording and Data Analysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The term inclusive education has unfortunately become sloganised and turned into a cliché which is used ubiquitously because it adds a progressive gloss to what people wish to say (Benjamin, ). When attempts are made to get behind the meaning of the word, little real substance, and/or confusion, is found (Allan & Slee, ). We were concerned then that these proposals ran the risk of engendering similar confusion about key concepts.…”
Section: The Fundamental Review: Contradictory and Ambiguous Discoursesmentioning
confidence: 99%