Doing Good, Feeling Good? Entrepreneurs’ Social Value Creation Beliefs and Work-Related Well-Being

Abstract

Entrepreneurs with social goals face various challenges; insights into how these entrepreneurs experience and appreciate their work remain a black box though. Drawing on identity, conservation of resources, and person–organization fit theories, this study examines how entrepreneurs’ social value creation beliefs relate to their work-related well-being (job satisfaction, work engagement, and lack of work burnout), as well as how this process might be influenced by social concerns with respect to the common good. Using data from the German Public Value Atlas 2015 and 2019 and the Swiss Public Value Atlas 2017, a three-study design analyzes three samples of entrepreneurs in Germany and Switzerland. Study 1 reveals that entrepreneurs report higher job satisfaction when they believe their organization creates social value. Study 2 indicates that these beliefs relate negatively to work burnout; entrepreneurs’ perceptions of having meaningful work mediate this relationship. Study 3 affirms and extends these results by showing that a sense of work meaningfulness mediates the relationship between social value creation beliefs and work engagement and that this mediating role is more prominent among entrepreneurs with strong social concerns. This investigation thus identifies a critical pathway—the extent to which entrepreneurs experience their work activities as important and personally meaningful—that connects social value creation beliefs with enhanced work-related well-being, as well as how this process might vary with a personal orientation that embraces the common good.

The Association Between Resilience and Performance: the Mediating Role of Workers’ Well-being

“…Concerning the evaluation of work-related well-being, there are several constructs used in the literature to do so. However, burnout and workaholism (as indicators of very low well-being), and job satisfaction, happiness at work, and work engagement (as indicators of high well-being) are the concepts more broadly used to evaluate work-related well-being (Brieger, Clercq, & Meynhardt, 2020;Fisher, 2014;Hakanen, Peeters, & Schaufeli, 2017;Salanova, Líbano, Llorens, & Schaufeli, 2013). Additionally, work-related well-being may affect the way individuals globally evaluate their life, i.e., context-free well-being (Carvalho & Chambel, 2014).…”

Beware of side effects on quality! Investigating the implications of home working on work-life balance in educational services

“…It is worth noting that OM may have positive implications on work-life balance. First, OM has been claimed to reduce the perceptions of work-related stress and exhaustion of employees, enhancing the individual work-related well-being (Lease et al, 2019;Brieger et al, 2020). Second, it increases the employees' effectiveness to deal with challenging work-related demands (Kim and Beehr, 2020), leading to the development of positive emotions which, in turn, are expected to increase work commitment and enrich the work-family interplay (Gloria and Steinhardt, 2017;Loi et al, 2018).…”

The Influence of COVID-19 on Entrepreneur's Psychological Well-Being

“…Scholars also used COR theory to explain entrepreneurial behavior (Lanivich, 2015) and the consequences of entrepreneurial failure (Yu et al, 2020). COR theory combines a variety of perspectives to explain the relationship between entrepreneurship and well-being, such as the value creation perspective (Brieger et al, 2021) and work-family balance perspective (Leung et al, 2020). Acquiring, protecting, and developing resources are important mechanisms in COR theory to deal with resource loss, which explains why some people can deal with resource uncertainty (Lanivich, 2015;Adomako, 2021).…”