Doing Gender in Academic Education: The Paradox of Visibility

Abstract

Recent contributions in the field of gender and organization point to the notion of paradox to unveil the persistence of gender inequality in organizations. This article seeks to contribute to this growing body of knowledge. We used the notion of paradox to reveal the processes of doing gender at an earth science department of a Dutch university in order to find out whether gender segregation in academic and professional careers has already started during academic education. We focused on the study choices of female students in earth sciences and discovered the paradox of visibility, which enabled us to show the contradictory and ambiguous nature of how gender is done at this department. In this article we discuss the relationship between doing gender and paradox on a theoretical as well as an empirical level. We argue that paradoxes could be very useful when analysing doing gender in organizations, because paradoxes focus on the social process in which individual agency and social structures come together. We even suggest that paradoxes might help us to disrupt the hierarchical nature of the gender binary, because they allow for a constant reflection on ambiguity and contradictions in theorizing as well as in practice._ 428 451..470

Challenging the gendered rhetoric of success? The limitations of women‐only mentoring for tackling gender inequality in the workplace

“…Within a paradox, two seemingly contradictory elements or situations can exist at the same time, exposing ambiguity and inconsistency and opening up potential for disruption and change through reflection on such uncertainties (Hearn, ; van den Brink & Stobbe, , ). The concept of paradox has been applied to various contexts, for example, transparency in academic recruitment (van den Brink, Benschop, & Jansen, ), women's position in the life sciences (van den Brink & Stobbe, ), and to analyse discourses of competence and gender deployed by female board members (Pesonen, Tienari, & Vanhala, ). In these and other cases, the concept of paradox has proven to be a useful heuristic device for thinking through ambiguity and contradiction, as well as resistance to and potential for change.…”

Informality, emotion and gendered career paths: The hidden toll of maternity leave on female academics and researchers

“…A substantial body of literature and research attests to the persistence of gender inequalities in academic and research careers, gender‐insensitive working environments and masculinist cultures in universities and in academic research, including the specific inequalities relating to motherhood and caring (e.g., Knights & Richards, ; O’Connor, ; Savonick & Davidson, ; Van den Brink & Benschop, ). The role of gendering processes and gendered practices in producing and reproducing these outcomes has been highlighted (O’Connor, O’Hagan, & Brannen, ; Van den Brink & Stobbe, ). Acker () develops the concept of ‘inequality regimes’ within work organizations to refer to the ways in which gender inequalities are continuously (re)produced through organizing processes that are not gender‐neutral and that can be more or less formal and more or less visible.…”

Agents for Change and Changed Agents: The Micro‐politics of Change and Feminism in the Academy

“…Benschop and Brouns, 2003;Priola, 2007;Van Den Brink and Stobbe, 2009) that the structure, culture and hierarchical arrangements of academia reproduces a particular system of gender relations that reflect a hegemonic position which privileges masculinity. As Benschop and Brouns (2003: 195) argue, despite 'the growing body of theoretical and empirical studies on gender, work and organisations', universities 'turn a deaf ear and a blind eye to the developed insight when it comes to their organising processes and principles'.…”