2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.micpath.2019.103616
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dogs as reservoir of methicillin resistant coagulase negative staphylococci strains – A possible neglected risk

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, patient signalment information was missing for a large portion of referral submissions, and was therefore excluded from the analysis. Finally, this study focused on four clinically relevant Staphylococcus species and, other than S. schleiferi, did not include coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), which have historically been considered non-pathogenic but may be important reservoirs for antimicrobial resistance genes ( Becker, Heilmann & Peters, 2014 ; Teixeira, De Oliveira Ferreira & De Araújo Penna, 2019 ). Given the increasing recognition of CoNS and their role in drug-resistant infections in humans ( Becker, Heilmann & Peters, 2014 ), future studies investigating antimicrobial resistance patterns in canine CoNS may be warranted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, patient signalment information was missing for a large portion of referral submissions, and was therefore excluded from the analysis. Finally, this study focused on four clinically relevant Staphylococcus species and, other than S. schleiferi, did not include coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), which have historically been considered non-pathogenic but may be important reservoirs for antimicrobial resistance genes ( Becker, Heilmann & Peters, 2014 ; Teixeira, De Oliveira Ferreira & De Araújo Penna, 2019 ). Given the increasing recognition of CoNS and their role in drug-resistant infections in humans ( Becker, Heilmann & Peters, 2014 ), future studies investigating antimicrobial resistance patterns in canine CoNS may be warranted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this respect, both farm and wild animals as well as pets are increasingly recognized as so far neglected source of MDR bacteria, including CoNS (40, 41, [44][45][46][47][48][49][50]. Another question that we therefore wanted to answer with the study addressed the possible influence of animal contact on colonization rates with MDR-CoNS isolates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few studies have been conducted investigating the frequency of CoNS and MRCoNS in healthy dogs, and the CoNS species detected in those studies are very variable. Ma et al reported that the most frequent CoNS among dogs in Australia was S. sciuri , whereas in Brazil and the United Kingdom, it was S. epidermidis followed by S. simulans and S. epidermidis , followed by S. warneri , respectively [ 44 , 87 , 88 ]. In Thailand, the most common CoNS species was S. chromogenes [ 89 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%