2009
DOI: 10.1080/09528820902786693
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dog Eat Dog: Who is in Charge of Controlling Art in The Post‐Socialist Condition?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As Edit András notes, "the reception of their projects was inevitably part of their expectations." 64 The body of the spectator is performatively filled with information and questions, and is being transformed into a "living" and critical document. "Little Warsaw's purpose is to expose the synchrony in historical perspectives and to accentuate that censorious reflection recontextualization is more important than reconstruction."…”
Section: /15mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Edit András notes, "the reception of their projects was inevitably part of their expectations." 64 The body of the spectator is performatively filled with information and questions, and is being transformed into a "living" and critical document. "Little Warsaw's purpose is to expose the synchrony in historical perspectives and to accentuate that censorious reflection recontextualization is more important than reconstruction."…”
Section: /15mentioning
confidence: 99%