2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2020.106430
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dog body size in Siberia and the Russian Far East and its implications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Briefly, most Holocene dog populations had to adapt to far smaller bodies than their Pleistocene predecessors and those of Holocene wolves. Correlated with their reduced sizes, Holocene dogs likely had smaller gape sizes and less bite strength than wolves, making handling and processing larger prey and larger food items more difficult (26). Body size is also positively correlated with foraging range size in extant carnivores (but does not necessarily determine it), and this could be used to infer that most Holocene dogs, particularly those living as free-ranging animals, would have had reduced range sizes compared to those of wolves (26).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Briefly, most Holocene dog populations had to adapt to far smaller bodies than their Pleistocene predecessors and those of Holocene wolves. Correlated with their reduced sizes, Holocene dogs likely had smaller gape sizes and less bite strength than wolves, making handling and processing larger prey and larger food items more difficult (26). Body size is also positively correlated with foraging range size in extant carnivores (but does not necessarily determine it), and this could be used to infer that most Holocene dogs, particularly those living as free-ranging animals, would have had reduced range sizes compared to those of wolves (26).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Siberia, no Pleistocene canid remains are widely accepted as dogs, but dogs are well documented in Siberian forager contexts by the early Holocene (~9000 years ago) and are widespread in southern Siberian pastoralist and agriculturalist societies by the Late Holocene (~3000 years ago) ( 6 , 22 25 ). Examination of skeletal remains from 199 dogs from 28 Siberian archaeological sites shows a gradual decrease in body mass through the Holocene, with the overall mean being just 16.4 ± 4.64 kg (Table 1) ( 26 ). Only 23 of the 199 dogs (11.6%) had body mass estimates greater than 21.5 kg.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Estimates of dog size offer no clues to the role played by dogs in the day‐to‐day lives of human populations. Small/medium‐sized dogs in the Eneolithic–EBA could be useful as guard dogs, shepherding or hunting dogs (small prey only), as pets, or for consumption, but probably not for military purposes, hunting large ungulates, or fighting off wolves and bears, so not for guarding livestock (debated in Harcourt, 1974; Bartosiewicz, 2002; Losey et al, 2020). Large and very small dogs—potentially with other roles—became common only later (Section 5.1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasing Levels of Western Eurasian Ancestry in Siberian Dogs over the Last 2 kya. We then applied our admixture graph-based method to assess admixture from Western Eurasian sources into later Siberian dogs from contexts dating between 2.0 kya to the present day, following a period of an apparent absence of directly dated dog remains in Siberia between ∼6.0 kya to 4.3 kya (24). In contrast to the earlier Lake Baikal dogs, all of the best fitting models for these dogs involved admixture from a Western Eurasian source (Fig.…”
Section: Significancementioning
confidence: 99%