2005
DOI: 10.1007/s00238-005-0728-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dog bites: an overview

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The incidence of dog bites in the present study was comparable to that in previous studies [3][4][5]. However, since only patients admitted to hospital were included, the number is probably underestimated.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The incidence of dog bites in the present study was comparable to that in previous studies [3][4][5]. However, since only patients admitted to hospital were included, the number is probably underestimated.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Twenty-eight percent of all children have a calculated risk of being bitten by a dog at least once [2]. The hand and forearm are involved in 18% to 68% of all dog bites [3][4][5]. The incidence varies from country zone to city areas (71.8 to 18.6/100 000) and among nationalities [2,4,[6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Dog bites to humans are a worldwide problem (Chomel and Trotignon, 1992;Bhanganada et al, 1993;Thompson, 1997;Kumar, 1999;Chen et al, 2000;Ozanne-Smith et al, 2001; Frangakis and Petridou, 2003;Horisberger et al, 2004;Van Eeckhout and Wylock, 2005;Morgan and Palmer, 2007). In the United States there are 300-1000 bites per 100 000 persons per year (Beaver, 1997;Cornwell, 1997) and reports from Switzerland and Belgium have indicated national bite rates of 180 (Horisberger et al, 2004) and 900 (Gisle et al, 2002) per 100 000 per year, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research has focused on the circumstances of incidents (Beck et al, 1975;Beck and Jones, 1985;Szpakowski et al, 1989;Mathews and Lattal, 1994;Thompson, 1997;Guy et al, 2001a; Frangakis and Petridou, 2003;Horisberger et al, 2004), characteristics of both biting dogs (Beck and Jones, 1985;Szpakowski et al, 1989;Gershman et al, 1994;Mathews and Lattal, 1994;Cornwell, 1997;Thompson, 1997;Guy et al, 2001b;Horisberger et al, 2004) and persons bitten (Beck and Jones, 1985;Bhanganada et al, 1993;Mathews and Lattal, 1994;Cornwell, 1997;Thompson, 1997;Savino et al, 2002;Horisberger et al, 2004), the estimation of public health costs (Bhanganada et al, 1993;Weiss et al, 1998), the pathological sequelae to attacks (Fishbein and Robinson, 1993;Mendez Gallart et al, 2002;Peters et al, 2004;Van Eeckhout and Wylock, 2005), and wound care for the victims (Van Eeckhout and Wylock, 2005;Morgan and Palmer, 2007). Unfortunately, few investigators have employed a formal reference series in their studies (Gershman et al, 1994;Chen et al, 2000;Guy et al, 2001c;Drobatz and Smith, 2003;Reisner et al, 2005), and thus research to date has been of limited value in identifying risk factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%