“…Research has focused on the circumstances of incidents (Beck et al, 1975;Beck and Jones, 1985;Szpakowski et al, 1989;Mathews and Lattal, 1994;Thompson, 1997;Guy et al, 2001a; Frangakis and Petridou, 2003;Horisberger et al, 2004), characteristics of both biting dogs (Beck and Jones, 1985;Szpakowski et al, 1989;Gershman et al, 1994;Mathews and Lattal, 1994;Cornwell, 1997;Thompson, 1997;Guy et al, 2001b;Horisberger et al, 2004) and persons bitten (Beck and Jones, 1985;Bhanganada et al, 1993;Mathews and Lattal, 1994;Cornwell, 1997;Thompson, 1997;Savino et al, 2002;Horisberger et al, 2004), the estimation of public health costs (Bhanganada et al, 1993;Weiss et al, 1998), the pathological sequelae to attacks (Fishbein and Robinson, 1993;Mendez Gallart et al, 2002;Peters et al, 2004;Van Eeckhout and Wylock, 2005), and wound care for the victims (Van Eeckhout and Wylock, 2005;Morgan and Palmer, 2007). Unfortunately, few investigators have employed a formal reference series in their studies (Gershman et al, 1994;Chen et al, 2000;Guy et al, 2001c;Drobatz and Smith, 2003;Reisner et al, 2005), and thus research to date has been of limited value in identifying risk factors.…”