1997
DOI: 10.1021/ja9622315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does π−σ−π Through-Bond Coupling Significantly Increase C−C Bond Lengths?

Abstract: Orbital effects ascribed to π-σ-π through-bond coupling are the result primarily of destabilizing filledfilled interactions; little to no mixing occurs between the antisymmetric π combination and σ*. The magnitude of through-bond coupling does not correlate with bond lengthening. Previous conclusions that through-bond coupling induces long bonds relied in some cases on poor X-ray data and/or inappropriate molecular orbital theories to deduce geometries. Comparison of semiempirical and empirical force field dat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The contrasting cyclization behavior of p -QDM versus TCNQ and TEQ reflects the additional steric strain in the cyclodimers of these substituted compounds, 20 and 21 , respectively. Figure shows the optimized geometries of the respective cyclodimers where, for example, the (sp 3 )­C–C­(sp 3 ) bond is considerably longer (1.7 Å versus 1.6 Å) in the substituted derivatives. , While compounds with even longer C–C bonds are known, compounds 20 and 21 are likely to be less kinetically stable since they carry not one but two such bonds, and they also lack the structural features to hold these long bonds together . Noncovalent interaction (NCI) analyses of the cyclodimers (Figure ) reveal additional repulsive interactions involving the cyano (TCNQ) and ethynyl (TEQ) substituents.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The contrasting cyclization behavior of p -QDM versus TCNQ and TEQ reflects the additional steric strain in the cyclodimers of these substituted compounds, 20 and 21 , respectively. Figure shows the optimized geometries of the respective cyclodimers where, for example, the (sp 3 )­C–C­(sp 3 ) bond is considerably longer (1.7 Å versus 1.6 Å) in the substituted derivatives. , While compounds with even longer C–C bonds are known, compounds 20 and 21 are likely to be less kinetically stable since they carry not one but two such bonds, and they also lack the structural features to hold these long bonds together . Noncovalent interaction (NCI) analyses of the cyclodimers (Figure ) reveal additional repulsive interactions involving the cyano (TCNQ) and ethynyl (TEQ) substituents.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus the role of indirect interaction through the ethylene bridges is negligible or merely absent, which is in agreement with ref. 36.…”
Section: Electron Density Distribution and Its Topologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it has been known for years that through-bond coupling can weaken the bond without changing the bond length. 38,39 Furthermore, to describe the BDE of an expanded C-C bond, the Lennard-Jones-type potential may be more appropriate than a simple linear correlation. Thus, the change in BDE with an increase in the length of pre-strained weak C-C bonds (>1.7 Å ) should Figure 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%