2016
DOI: 10.1080/13545701.2016.1211305
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does Women’s Labor Force Participation Reduce Domestic Violence? Evidence from Jordan

Abstract: Enhancing women's labor force participation is seen as a way to promote their empowerment and improve their well-being and that of their children. The empirical literature on the relationship between women's employment status and domestic violence is less clear-cut. Using quantitative data from Jordan in 2007, this study explores the effect of women's employment, as measured by their participation in paid work outside the home, on reported domestic violence, controlling for the potential endogeneity of women's… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
50
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
3
50
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Such an argument is in congruent with the resources theory on domestic violence which presupposes that family members with more resources traditionally command higher power and assure obedience and compliance while those with less resources use violence to maintain power (K. L. Anderson, 1997;Pallikadavath & Bradley, 2018;Warner et al, 1986). But on the other hand, studies that have controlled for endogeneity when modelling the association between intimate partner violence and women's working status have not found a significant association between women's working status and domestic violence, indicating that women's working status does not necessarily lead to domestic violence (Lenze & Klasen, 2017).…”
Section: High and Complete Abusementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such an argument is in congruent with the resources theory on domestic violence which presupposes that family members with more resources traditionally command higher power and assure obedience and compliance while those with less resources use violence to maintain power (K. L. Anderson, 1997;Pallikadavath & Bradley, 2018;Warner et al, 1986). But on the other hand, studies that have controlled for endogeneity when modelling the association between intimate partner violence and women's working status have not found a significant association between women's working status and domestic violence, indicating that women's working status does not necessarily lead to domestic violence (Lenze & Klasen, 2017).…”
Section: High and Complete Abusementioning
confidence: 99%
“…the endogenous variable) and exogenous in the basic model. The intuition behind choosing the cluster average of women's working status as an IV is that it reflects employment opportunities at the area of living and more importantly it shows the effectiveness of the social networks (Lenze & Klasen, 2017). Previous research has suggested that social networks and employment probability are strongly correlated (Montgomery, 1991).…”
Section: Instrumental Variable Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, women's employment or working for money has been associated with lower violence in some settings [29] but higher in others [19,[29][30][31][32] with some suggestion that formal employment may be more protective than irregular or seasonal employment [33] and longer duration of employment more protective than shorter [34]. Other studies from a range of countries indicate no association between women's employment or income and IPV [19,29,35]. Women's higher economic contribution to the household was associated with higher past year physical violence in one study in Bangladesh [15], but no significant association was found in two other Bangladesh sites [14,21] or in the Philippines [36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%