2011
DOI: 10.3386/w17440
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does Widowhood Explain Gender Differences in Out-of-Pocket Medical Spending Among the Elderly?

Abstract: Despite the presence of Medicare, out-of-pocket medical spending is a large expenditure risk facing the elderly. While women live longer than men, elderly women incur higher out-of-pocket medical spending than men at each age. In this paper, we examine whether differences in marital status and living arrangements can explain this difference. We find that out-of-pocket medical spending is approximately 29 percent higher when an individual becomes widowed, a large portion of which is spending on nursing homes. O… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Health cost for men are a bit lower than for women, in all models (also in line with Goda et al . () and Table ). Life expectancy is lower for men compared to women in both models.…”
Section: Health Cost Models For Expendituresmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Health cost for men are a bit lower than for women, in all models (also in line with Goda et al . () and Table ). Life expectancy is lower for men compared to women in both models.…”
Section: Health Cost Models For Expendituresmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Although an important factor, Goda et al . () find that only one‐third of the difference in out‐of‐pocket health cost between men and women is due to marital status. For simplicity we focus on single households, as in De Nardi et al .…”
Section: Health Cost Models For Expendituresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It covers four groups of services, namely: hospital/nursing; doctor/outpatient/dental; prescription drugs; and home health care/special services. Our focus on out‐of‐pocket medical expenditure, namely medical expenditure minus that covered by insurance, follows numerous contributions to the existing health economics literature (such as Palumbo, ; Finkelstein and McKnight, ; and, more recently, Goda et al ., ; Goldman and Maestas, ) and reflects the argument that it is a measure of the actual financial burden of medical expenditure incurred by individuals, as well as a significant source of financial risk. It is important to acknowledge, however, that type of insurance status has an important influence on out‐of‐pocket expenditure and that the extent to which we are able to control for such factors is somewhat limited.…”
Section: Empirical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent research has examined parents' role in helping children after negative shocks (Edwards, 2019;Kaplan, 2012;McGarry, 2016), but less attention has been paid to children's role in alleviating the impacts of negative shocks for their parents. Though upstream financial transfers from children to parents are less common, they may have significant welfare effects if they are given in response to declining income, wealth, or health 1 See Schwandt (2018) and Pool et al (2018) on the effects of wealth shocks, Chan and Stevens (2001) and Salm (2009) on the effects of job loss, Dobkin et al (2018) and Wu (2003) on the effects of health shocks, and Sharma (2015) and Goda, Shoven and Slavov (2013) on the effects of divorce and widowhood.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%