Does Welfare Provision Promote Democratic State Legitimacy? Evidence from Brazil’s Bolsa Família Program

Abstract

Conditional cash transfer programs may boost the electoral fortunes of incumbents among beneficiary groups, but do they also influence recipient attitudes toward state legitimacy? This article examines the relationship between Brazil's Bolsa Família program and recipients’ sense of the Brazilian state's political legitimacy, from 2007 to 2014. Using AmericasBarometer data and propensity score matching, this study provides evidence that targeted cash benefits correlate with citizens’ views of the state, but that this relationship is limited to increasing trust in core state institutions, local government, and incumbent political actors. Diffuse dimensions of regime legitimacy, including recipients’ sense of political community, support for regime principles, and retrospective perceptions of national economic performance, are largely unaffected by the receipt of targeted benefits. Over time, the evidence also suggests that the impact of program receipt on these measures of support remains largely unchanged.

Translating politics into policy implementation: welfare frontline workers in polarised Brazil

“…Despite the relative political stability of the last two decades, a consensus regarding welfare policies is still far from being realised in Latin America (Layton et al , 2018), and the region's model of poverty reduction is – once again – a contested space. Two clear tendencies over the last two decades can be observed: a steep reduction in poverty and an increase in social rights (Barrientos, 2016; Merrien, 2013).…”

Looking forward and looking backward: Economic evaluations and regime support in China

“…This approach assumes that the effects of economic evaluation on regime support work through citizens’ evaluations of their individual economic status rather than referring to statistics on the national economic condition. Studies find that citizens’ personal living standards are the best predictor of regime support (Dickson et al, 2016; Finan and Schechter, 2012; Layton et al, 2017). If a person’s household economic situation is less satisfactory, he or she may withdraw support for the regime.…”

Varieties of Regulatory Welfare Regimes in Middle-Income Countries: A Comparative Analysis of Brazil, Mexico, and Turkey

“…While a number of studies emphasize the electoral pay-offs of social assistance programs (Cornelius 2004; De la O 2013; Díaz-Cayeros, Estévez, and Magaloni 2016; Hunter and Power 2007; Zucco 2013), others highlight their mobilizing effect rather than their ability to boost pro-incumbent votes (de la O 2015; Layton and Smith 2015). Several studies demarcate the regime-level implications of social assistance (Holland and Schneider 2017; Layton, Donaghy, and Rennó 2017; Özel and Yildirim 2019).…”