2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00271-019-00646-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does water-saving irrigation improve the quality of fruits and vegetables? Evidence from meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
24
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
3
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The predefined study inclusion criteria were: (i) the study had to report at least one root trait measured under both low or no K treatment (experimental treatment) and high or replete K treatment (control); (ii) the root traits should be reported on the same scale for both the experimental and the control treatments; (iii) the environmental conditions for the experimental and control groups, including plant species, and soil properties of each experiment were the same, and experiments were performed at the same temporal and spatial scales in the control and treatment groups; (iv) an included study must report means (X) for the measured trait(s) and the reported X, sample size (n) and a measure of dispersion (standard error [SE], standard deviation [SD], or 95% confidence interval [CI]) should be present as numerical or graphical data, or it should be possible to estimate from the reported data. In studies where SEs were provided, SDs were computed as the product of the SE and the square-root of n. However, where SD or SE was not available, SD was reassigned as one-tenth of the X and the effect of this assumption on the results assessed via sensitivity analyses [29,30]. To avoid multiple counting, the reported data must originate from primary research, and should not have been already included in another paper.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The predefined study inclusion criteria were: (i) the study had to report at least one root trait measured under both low or no K treatment (experimental treatment) and high or replete K treatment (control); (ii) the root traits should be reported on the same scale for both the experimental and the control treatments; (iii) the environmental conditions for the experimental and control groups, including plant species, and soil properties of each experiment were the same, and experiments were performed at the same temporal and spatial scales in the control and treatment groups; (iv) an included study must report means (X) for the measured trait(s) and the reported X, sample size (n) and a measure of dispersion (standard error [SE], standard deviation [SD], or 95% confidence interval [CI]) should be present as numerical or graphical data, or it should be possible to estimate from the reported data. In studies where SEs were provided, SDs were computed as the product of the SE and the square-root of n. However, where SD or SE was not available, SD was reassigned as one-tenth of the X and the effect of this assumption on the results assessed via sensitivity analyses [29,30]. To avoid multiple counting, the reported data must originate from primary research, and should not have been already included in another paper.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 n and 12 n are the sample sizes; of subgroups 1 and 2 [31]. If a study, however, reported data on different crops or varieties of crops, these were considered as independent subgroups and were included separately in the meta-analysis if the data reported were single time-point data for the different crops species or varieties [29,30].…”
Section: Handling Of Complex Data Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations