Does watching a monkey change its behaviour? Quantifying observer effects in habituated wild primates using automated radiotelemetry

Abstract

In studies of animal behaviour, researchers have long been concerned that their presence may change the conduct of their study subjects. To minimize observer effects, researchers often habituate their study animals. The premise of this method is that, with sufficient neutral exposure, animals will stop reacting to humans. While numerous studies demonstrate that negative responses to humans decrease over time, the fact that an animal does not flee from or behave aggressively towards observers cannot be taken as evidence that it is not altering its behaviour in other, more subtle ways. Because remotely monitoring the behaviour of wild animals is difficult, it has not been possible to answer the critical question: do habituated animals change their behaviour when researchers are present? Here, we use data from an automated radiotelemetry system that remotely monitored the movement and activity of radiocollared animals to test whether observers affected the behaviour of seven habituated white-faced capuchins, Cebus capucinus. We found no evidence that observers influenced the ranging behaviour or activity patterns of their study subjects. Capuchins did not move faster, stop to rest less frequently, or display higher levels of activity when they were being followed compared to when they were alone. It has been suggested that researchers may embolden habituated study subjects, artificially increasing their relative dominance, but we found no relationship between observer presence and proximity to neighbouring social groups. Although it remains possible that observer effects existed but were too subtle to be detected with the remote sensing technology we used, the results of this study nevertheless provide reassuring evidence that humans can observe habituated wild animals without overly influencing the animals' activity and movement patterns. Ó

Helpers influence on territory use and maintenance in Alpine marmot groups

“…We used two observation points (one per study area) located at a minimum distance of 100 meters from the closest group to avoid potential disturbance arising from the presence of the researchers (Crofoot et al 2010). We collected 2454 spatial locations for 58 individuals (i.e.…”

Factors Influencing the Ranging Behavior of Chacma Baboons (Papio hamadryas ursinus) Living in a Human-Modified Habitat

“…Any study of the effects of alien species eradication will also need to account for the variety of other ecological factors that influence primate ranging behavior, including food resources (Buzzard 2006;Clutton-Brock 1975;Di Fiore 2003); sleeping sites (Smith et al 2007;Wang et al 2011;Zhou et al 2011); geophagy sites (Pages et al 2005;Shimooka 2005;Spehar et al 2010); environmental conditions such as day length, temperature, and rainfall (Dunbar 1992;Hill et al 2003;van Doorn et al 2010); predators (Altmann and Altmann 1970;Isbell 1994;Matsuda et al 2009); and observer presence (Crofoot et al 2010;Rasmussen 1991).…”

Observing the unwatchable through acceleration logging of animal behavior

“…Direct observation presents obvious difficulties when animals perceive humans as predators [3] or when they are naturally secretive and elusive [4,5]. Habituating individuals to an observer is sometimes possible but it is labor-intensive, and can require long-term study [6,7]. Furthermore, though the subjects under study may be habituated, human presence can still affect their behavioral interactions with other non-habituated predator, prey or competitor species [8].…”