Does visual representation of futsal shoes outsole tread groove design resemblance its mechanical traction, dynamic human traction performance, and perceived traction during change of direction and straight sprint tasks?

Ismail, Shariman Ismadi; Nunome, Hiroyuki; Tamura, Yuji

doi:10.1080/19424280.2020.1825534

Cited by 9 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It was reported that AFC possessed substantial influence on the change of direction and perceived traction performances. Similarly, as reported in this study, Ismail et al (2020) reported that participants have performed significantly better when using S2 (AFC: 1.34) and S3 (AFC: 1.30) shoes as compared with S1 shoe (AFC: 1.25). Thus, it was suggested that differences on the AFC component between the shoes of S1 and S2 as well as S1 and S3 could potentially influence the outcomes of the study.…”

Section: Influence Of Available Friction Coefficientsupporting

confidence: 86%

“…Currently, there is no existing study that has compared the influence of both AFC and FBS on change of direction performance. Therefore, it is still difficult to establish a clear conclusion, but as observed in this study and previous study (Ismail et al, 2020) it can be speculated that AFC could potentially possess a much dominant influence on change of direction performance as compared with FBS.…”

Section: Influence Of Available Friction Coefficientmentioning

confidence: 55%

“…The three shoes selected in this study were also selected in other previous study (Ismail et al, 2020 ), where the available traction (the AFC) of all the shoes were mechanically measured. The influence of AFC on change of direction and perceived traction performances was observed in the study by Ismail et al ( 2020 ). It was reported that AFC possessed substantial influence on the change of direction and perceived traction performances.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“… * Data based on the previous study (Ismail et al, 2020 ), reproduced with permission from the publisher (license number: 4937400524403) . …”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

The Influence of Forefoot Bending Stiffness of Futsal Shoes on Multiple V-Cut Run Performance

2021

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A forefoot bending stiffness (FBS) property of footwear is known to benefit athletes in running performance. To date, the efficacy of bending stiffness on performance is rather unknown from the perspective of futsal shoes. This study investigates the influence of bending stiffness property of three commercial futsal shoes on change of direction run resultant performance. Nineteen university level athletes participated in the human performance test (multiple V-cut change of direction run) on a hardwood flooring facility using three pairs of futsal shoes (i.e., S1, S2, and S3) with different models but similar in outsole material (S1—mass: 311 g, heel-to-toe drop: 10 mm, friction coefficient, 1.25; S2—mass: 232 g, heel-to-toe drop: 8 mm, friction coefficient: 1.34; and S3—mass: 276 g, heel-to-toe drop: 7 mm, friction coefficient: 1.30). The FBS properties for each shoe were mechanically measured. Results from the analysis of variance indicated that there was a significant difference of FBS value among the three shoes (S1: 0.32 Nm/deg., S2: 0.26 Nm/deg., and S3: 0.36 Nm/deg.) [F(2,8) = 28.50 (p < 0.001)]. Shoes with relatively higher shoe-playing surface friction coefficient (S2 and S3) had significant impact on the V-cut performance (p < 0.05) when compared with the shoe with lower friction coefficient (S1). In contrast to the literature, the shoe with the lowest FBS (S2) did not suffer any detriments on the resultant performance in the test conducted. These findings suggested that there could be other performance limiting factors, such as the friction coefficient, rather than FBS that have greater influence on the test outcomes.

show abstract

Section: Influence Of Available Friction Coefficientsupporting

confidence: 86%

Section: Influence Of Available Friction Coefficientmentioning

confidence: 55%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“… * Data based on the previous study (Ismail et al, 2020 ), reproduced with permission from the publisher (license number: 4937400524403) . …”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

The Influence of Forefoot Bending Stiffness of Futsal Shoes on Multiple V-Cut Run Performance

2021

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Shoe-surface friction or traction in various sports has been linked to performance and injury risk [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. Higher friction has been shown to improve the performance of change of direction movements in association football [5], basketball [3] and futsal [8]. It has also been hypothesised that higher friction during such movements increases the risk of ACL injury due to biomechanical changes often employed by athletes when performing sidesteps on higher friction surfaces, e.g.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of simulated tennis steps and slides on tread element friction and wear

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In hard court tennis, players change direction by either stepping or sliding. The shoe–surface friction during these movements is crucial to player performance. Too little friction when stepping may result in a slip. Too much friction when attempting to slide could cause the player to move only a short distance, or to fail to slide. To understand the influence of tread design on shoe–surface friction in tennis, experiments were performed on individual shoe tread elements that replicated the tribological conditions typically experienced during hard court step and slide movements. Tread element orientation had no effect on the static friction in step movements, but longer tread elements (in the sliding direction) had 9% lower dynamic friction during slide movements (p < 0.001). The friction between tennis shoe tread and hard court tennis surfaces is also shown to be influenced by the tread’s sliding history, and the wearing pattern that forms on the surface of the rubber.

show abstract

Mechanical Testing of Futsal Footwear: Friction Coefficient Under Different Sliding Direction

Ismail

Nunome

Lysdal

et al. 2023

Lecture Notes in Bioengineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Does visual representation of futsal shoes outsole tread groove design resemblance its mechanical traction, dynamic human traction performance, and perceived traction during change of direction and straight sprint tasks?

Cited by 9 publications

References 22 publications

The Influence of Forefoot Bending Stiffness of Futsal Shoes on Multiple V-Cut Run Performance

The Influence of Forefoot Bending Stiffness of Futsal Shoes on Multiple V-Cut Run Performance

Effect of simulated tennis steps and slides on tread element friction and wear

Mechanical Testing of Futsal Footwear: Friction Coefficient Under Different Sliding Direction

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About