2015
DOI: 10.32398/cjhp.v13i2.1821
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does Type of Disability Matter to Public Health Policy and Practice?

Abstract: Background: Surveillance has been insufficient to inform and evaluate public health practices for people with disabilities. No studies have investigated whether there is statistical justification for subdividing the large, heterogeneous group of people with disabilities into subpopulations, for surveillance. Methods: Pooled data from the Medical Expenditures Panel Survey (2004-2010, unweighted n=132,198) included the following disability types: physical, cognitive, visual, hearing loss, and multiple disabiliti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…15) [2]. We searched literature from a myriad of disciplines, including disability studies [7], education [8], medicine [9], social science [10], psychology [11], technology [12], and governmental organizations [13] with both domestic [14] and international [15] origins to ensure inclusion of a variety of conceptualizations of (dis)ability in the model. Existing frameworks for categorizing (dis)ability have focused on the specifics of the population in the study [8], defined categories based on specific diagnoses [16] or made definitions as a means of determining who gets access and services [13].…”
Section: Model Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15) [2]. We searched literature from a myriad of disciplines, including disability studies [7], education [8], medicine [9], social science [10], psychology [11], technology [12], and governmental organizations [13] with both domestic [14] and international [15] origins to ensure inclusion of a variety of conceptualizations of (dis)ability in the model. Existing frameworks for categorizing (dis)ability have focused on the specifics of the population in the study [8], defined categories based on specific diagnoses [16] or made definitions as a means of determining who gets access and services [13].…”
Section: Model Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most works in Europe focus on a single country (such as the recent analyses referring to Ireland [18] and Turkey [30]). Others even focus on specific subgroups of the population, such as children with special needs [31], disabled people [32] or HIV-infected patients [33], to quote just a few among the most recent works. Only a small number of studies that cover a large group of European countries have been carried out and their objectives have been to identify the main factors associated with unmet needs [4,[6][7][8][9][10]29,34,35].…”
Section: J O U R N a L P R E -P R O O Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With such a high cost, the nation’s health is expected to be among the best in the world; however, health care–induced spending, when combined with ongoing systemic challenges in the industry, is not improving the overall life expectancy of the US population ( 1 ). Further, the US health care system is not adequately coordinating care for patients with complex conditions, including people with disabilities (PWD), which may contribute to health disparities within this population ( 2 ). People with disabilities receive fewer treatment services than persons without disabilities, including preventative care such as screenings, vaccinations, and promotion of physical activity (PA) from health care professionals (HCPs) ( 3 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EMHB is used by public health professionals to address behavior change for communities they serve; however, health behavior interventions can be a low-cost initiative that HCPs can implement into their practice ( 5 ). The purposes of this article are ( 1 ) to explore the empirical experience of PWD within health care and PA arenas and ( 2 ) to provide future care implementation strategies for HCPs as informed by the EMHB.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%