2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2017.08.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does transcutaneous nerve stimulation have effect on sympathetic skin response?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The increased SSR latency due to the combined treatment of ESWT and INI may highlight the suppressive influence of these treatments on sympathetic function. The multiple interneuron interface between afferent and efferent fibers in the reflex path may result in the loss or delay of SSR [ 42 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increased SSR latency due to the combined treatment of ESWT and INI may highlight the suppressive influence of these treatments on sympathetic function. The multiple interneuron interface between afferent and efferent fibers in the reflex path may result in the loss or delay of SSR [ 42 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most prevalent and critical skin receptors relate to pressure, temperature, and pain [ 1 ] —the Pacinian corpuscle, [ 3 ] thermoreceptor, [ 4 ] and nociceptor, [ 5,6 ] respectively. All these receptors detect stimuli, measure levels of stimuli, and transmit signals to the brain triggering reactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perry et al [46] reported that active manipulation therapies directed toward the lumbar region affected simultaneous SSR measurements and increased sympathoexcitatory activities, although another study reported that active exercise and manipulation resulted in significant changes in SSR [47]. One study of the effect on SSR of active TENS and sham TENS in healthy individuals reported no change in post-application latency values, while amplitude values increased significantly in the active TENS group [48]. Similarly in the present study, while no significant change was observed after treatment in the bTENS group, a significant increase was recorded in amplitude values.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%