2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-17193-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does trade openness mitigate the environmental degradation in South Africa?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
26
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

6
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 126 publications
5
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The predicted long- and short-run coefficients for trade openness (InOPEN) are both positive and statistically significant, meaning that a 1 percent increase in trade openness results in 0.105 and 0.214 percent increases in CO 2 emissions in the long and short run, respectively. Udeagha and Ngepah ( 2022 , 2021c ) agreed with our findings, stating that trade openness has a significant negative impact on environmental quality in South Africa. The pollution-raising role of trade openness naturally raises worries about South Africa's government and policymakers' escalating trade liberalisation initiatives.…”
Section: Empirical Results and Their Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The predicted long- and short-run coefficients for trade openness (InOPEN) are both positive and statistically significant, meaning that a 1 percent increase in trade openness results in 0.105 and 0.214 percent increases in CO 2 emissions in the long and short run, respectively. Udeagha and Ngepah ( 2022 , 2021c ) agreed with our findings, stating that trade openness has a significant negative impact on environmental quality in South Africa. The pollution-raising role of trade openness naturally raises worries about South Africa's government and policymakers' escalating trade liberalisation initiatives.…”
Section: Empirical Results and Their Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…As a result, we propose the typical EKC hypothesis as follows, based on Udeagha and Ngepah ( 2022 , 2021c ), Udeagha and Breitenbach ( 2021 ), and Cole and Elliott ( 2003 ): where CO 2 denotes the CO 2 emissions, a proxy for environmental quality; SE is a scale effect that captures economic growth (income); and TE is a technique effect that captures the square of economic growth. Log-linearising Eq.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the reasons attributed to this is that, as people’s awareness of the environment/income grows, environmental restrictions are enacted to encourage the use of renewable energy/energy-efficient technologies to mitigate CO 2 emissions. This finding concurs with Udeagha and Breitenbach’s ( 2021 ) research in the Southern African Development Community (SADC), Udeagha and Ngepah’s ( 2021 ) in SA, Alharthi et al’s ( 2021 ) in the MENA countries, and Bibi and Jamil’s ( 2021 ) in six regions, and among others. The long-run finding supports Meadows et al’s ( 1992 ) argument that growth may be required to maintain environmental quality.…”
Section: Empirical Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…A sustainable economic growth in the country results in a higher national income and more employment, resulting in a higher standard of living (Mohamed et al 2022 ). Therefore, the literature review part is broken down following (Udeagha and Ngepah 2022a , b , c ) into four sub-sections. For a full understanding of the relationship between technological innovation, foreign direct investment, trade openness, human capital, and economic growth, in context of Bangladesh, this research has considered them simultaneously.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%