2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00508-019-1527-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does third trimester cervical length predict duration of first stage of labor?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the study performed by Lehner et al, they focused on the correlation between the cervical length and the duration of the first stage of labor. They mentioned that there was no correlation between the cervical length and the duration of labor, which might be reassuring to women with elongated cervices [11]. This was following our findings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the study performed by Lehner et al, they focused on the correlation between the cervical length and the duration of the first stage of labor. They mentioned that there was no correlation between the cervical length and the duration of labor, which might be reassuring to women with elongated cervices [11]. This was following our findings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…They also reported a continued decrease in cervical length as gestation advances. This is explained by the antenatal changes occurring in the cervix and during labor to accomplish complete dilatation, although independent of its length [11]. Induction of labor was required for about one-third of patients (45.45% nulliparous and 31.25% multiparous women), with 14.8% were due to postdate gestation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study comparing selective cervical ligation with simple observation, but without determining whether and what risk factors were present, found no statistically significant difference between the two comparison groups. This result is similar to that of singleton pregnancies where routine cervical cerclage in all pregnancies without appropriate case selection has been found to offer no benefit [36][37][38][39][40].…”
Section: Cervical Cerclagesupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Ultrasound findings in combination with a history of preterm delivery, i.e. preterm delivery before 34 weeks in a previous pregnancy and cervical length in the current pregnancy below 25 mm as found in an ultrasound check before 24 weeks of pregnancy [36][37][38][39][40].…”
Section: Cervical Cerclagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[17] Although cervical length measurement is not routinely recommended in the third trimester, [4] it can be used in patients with a short cervix and in estimating the mode or time of deliv-ery. [18] In our study, we aimed to compare cervical lengths measured using TA and TV ultrasound during three trimesters. Thus, we had the opportunity to investigate the effects of anatomic and positional changes related to pregnancy in the uterus and cervix on the ultrasound methods, separately in each trimester.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%