1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(98)00149-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does the visual system exploit projective geometry to help solve the motion correspondence problem?

Abstract: Projective geometry determines how the retinal image of an object deforms as it moves through three-dimensional space. Does the visual system use constraints derived from this information, such as rigidity, to aid the tracking of moving objects? A novel psychophysical technique is introduced for assessing which of two competing motion transformations is 'preferred' by the visual system, in a two-frame sequence. In the first experiment, relative preference strengths for translations parallel and perpendicular t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…20 The 3-D internal representation in the HVS and the rigidity hypothesis in correspondence finding, while tracking moving objects, is still a matter of scientific debate. Eagle et al 21 have found a preference toward translation in explaining competing motion transformations in a twoframe sequence with little regard for the projective shape transformations.…”
Section: Mental Transformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 The 3-D internal representation in the HVS and the rigidity hypothesis in correspondence finding, while tracking moving objects, is still a matter of scientific debate. Eagle et al 21 have found a preference toward translation in explaining competing motion transformations in a twoframe sequence with little regard for the projective shape transformations.…”
Section: Mental Transformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, we find the rotation transformation corresponding to the angle e r ¼ arctan 2ðm 21 ; m 11 Þ in radians and remove it by multiplying with an inverse rotation matrix.…”
Section: Transformation Decompositionmentioning
confidence: 99%