2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2017.10.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does the surgical waiting list affect pathological and survival outcome in resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma?

Abstract: The duration of the surgical waiting-list did not affect pathological features and survival. Delayed surgery was associated with increased cancer size on the specimen. However, surgery should not be delayed for PDACs < 20 mm as this may negatively affect the prognosis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
23
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
4
23
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, TSPAN8 serves as a prognostic marker in other cancer types as well 37 . Apart from time between surgery and chemotherapy, time to surgery may play an important role in PDAC as well (waiting for more than 30 days for surgery after diagnosis has been associated to an increase in tumor size) 43 . DEG DKK4 (also top 1% DADA gene) is the least studied protein from the Dickkopf (DKK) family, which includes DKK3 44 and DKK1 44 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, TSPAN8 serves as a prognostic marker in other cancer types as well 37 . Apart from time between surgery and chemotherapy, time to surgery may play an important role in PDAC as well (waiting for more than 30 days for surgery after diagnosis has been associated to an increase in tumor size) 43 . DEG DKK4 (also top 1% DADA gene) is the least studied protein from the Dickkopf (DKK) family, which includes DKK3 44 and DKK1 44 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The start of this pathway was the date of initial CT, which is considered the single best investigation required for diagnosing, or at least raising suspicion of, periampullary cancer; this has been used elsewhere when reviewing outcomes of patients treated within these pathways. The sensitivity and specificity of CT in identifying pancreatic cancer is 70–100 per cent, and its ability to evaluate resectability based on locoregional, distant and vascular involvement is 81–99 per cent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the absence of a coordinated pathway, the need for multiple and/or specialist investigations, as well as multidisciplinary reviews, inevitably prolongs the time from presentation to surgery. Preoperative interventions to correct malnutrition and jaundice, both common problems in patients with periampullary cancer, may also serve to complicate the pathway further. Despite evidence that preoperative biliary drainage is harmful, patients with potentially resectable disease frequently undergo ERCP before referral to a specialist centre.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interim chemotherapy was an option in case of patients at a high risk of developing postoperative complications. Patients with cephalic lesions deserving a pancreatoduodenectomy were scheduled for surgery only in case of tumours smaller than 2 cm [77]. This subjects (for low comorbidities burden, optimal nutritional status and younger age) are the more likely to bene t from a radical resection and are at lower risk of developing postoperative complications, taking in consideration the availability of beds in the intensive care units for the COVID-19 pandemic.…”
Section: Guidelines/recommendation For Pancreatic Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%