Does the Slim‐Disk Model Correctly Consider Photon‐trapping Effects?

Abstract

We investigate the photon-trapping effects in the super-critical black hole accretion flows by solving radiation transfer as well as the energy equations of radiation and gas. It is found that the slim-disk model generally overestimates the luminosity of the disk at around the Eddington luminosity (L E ) and is not accurate in describing the effective temperature profile, since it neglects time delay between energy generation at deeper inside the disk and energy release at the surface. Especially, the photon-trapping effects are appreciable even below L ∼ L E , while they appear above ∼ 3L E according to the slim disk. Through the photon-trapping effects, the luminosity is reduced and the effective temperature profile becomes flatter than r −3/4 as in the standard disk. In the case that the viscous heating is effective only around the equatorial plane, the luminosity is kept around the Eddington luminosity even at very large mass accretion rate,Ṁ ≫ L E /c 2 . The effective temperature profile is almost flat, and the maximum temperature decreases in accordance with rise in the mass accretion rate. Thus, the most luminous radius shifts to the outer region whenṀ /(L E /c 2 ) ≫ 10 2 . In the case that the energy is dissipated equally at any heights, the resultant luminosity is somewhat larger than in the former case, but the energy-conversion efficiency still decreases with increase of the mass accretion rate, as well. The most luminous radius stays around the inner edge of the disk in the latter case. Hence, the effective temperature profile is sensitive to the vertical distribution of energy production rates, so is the spectral shape. Future observations of high L/L E objects will be able to test our model.

The Relation between Star Formation Rate and Accretion Rate in LINERs

“…However, all the Eddington ratios of NLS1s in our sample are less than 6 (L Bol /L Edd , see table 2 in Satyapal et al 2005) and the radiative efficiencies of slim disks with such Eddington ratios may not deviate much from that of the standard disk (see, dashed line and solid line of Fig. 1 in Ohsuga et al 2002). So, the derived mass accretion rates should be accurate to a factor of 2 for NLS1s in these sample, which will not alter our main conclusion.…”

A Global Three-Dimensional Radiation Magneto-Hydrodynamic Simulation of Super-Eddington Accretion Disks

“…However, beyond that, vertical energy advection speed is the dominant one. If r trap is still defined as the radius within which photons are advected toward the black hole before they have time to escape, r trap should be 5r s , instead of ∼330r s (Equation (1) of Ohsuga et al 2002) as in the slim disk model for the accretion rate in this simulation. The importance of vertical advective energy transport can also be shown by considering the local heating and different cooling mechanisms as done in local shearing box simulations (Hirose et al 2009b;Jiang et al 2013a).…”

Shining in the dark: the spectral evolution of the first black holes

“…Therefore, only a fraction of the photons produced in the accretion disk is able to free stream out of R tr : consequently, the effective radiation and radiation pressure escaping to infinity is decreased (see e.g. Begelman 1978;Ohsuga et al 2002). While the slim disk solution is the simplest and most tested model for super-critical accretion, alternatives exist, e.g the ZEro-BeRnoulli Accretion (ZEBRA, Coughlin & Begelman 2014) and the ADiabatic Inflow-Outflow Solutions (ADIOS, Blandford & Begelman 1999;Begelman 2012) models.…”