2011
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcr027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does the silver moss Bryum argenteum exhibit sex-specific patterns in vegetative growth rate, asexual fitness or prezygotic reproductive investment?

Abstract: Evidence for three distinct ecotypes is presented for a bryophyte based on regeneration traits. Prior to zygote production, the sexes of this bryophyte did not differ in vegetative growth traits but significantly differed in reproductive investment, with the latter differences potentially implicated in the strongly biased female sex ratio. The disparity between males and females for prezygotic reproductive investment is the highest known for bryophytes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
39
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
5
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the same way that the infrequent presence of sporophytes may explain female bias in some bryophytes Rydgren et al, 2010;Horsley et al, 2011), the relative rareness of C. patrisiae females in our study may be a phenotypic response to the exceptionally high fertilization success in females which subsequently incur relatively higher per capita expenditures of resource allocation as a result of greater rates of sporophyte maturation (É hrlen et al, 2000;Stark et al, 2000;Rydgren & Økland, 2002a).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the same way that the infrequent presence of sporophytes may explain female bias in some bryophytes Rydgren et al, 2010;Horsley et al, 2011), the relative rareness of C. patrisiae females in our study may be a phenotypic response to the exceptionally high fertilization success in females which subsequently incur relatively higher per capita expenditures of resource allocation as a result of greater rates of sporophyte maturation (É hrlen et al, 2000;Stark et al, 2000;Rydgren & Økland, 2002a).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Female dominance in dioicous bryophytes is suggested to be a result of the infrequent production of sporophytes (McLetchie, 1992;Stark et al, 2000;Rydgren et al, 2010;Horsley et al, 2011) with associated higher pre-zygotic cost of reproduction for the male sex Horsley et al, 2011; but see Bisang et al, 2006 for an exception). Males are expected to allocate disproportionately more resources than females due to the fact that there is only investment in production of gametes, whereas the greatest investment in female gametangia occurs following fertilization: a relatively rare event for most dioicous bryophytes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spatial segregation of males and females is reflected in their dramatically different biology. In particular, male and female gametophytes of unisexual species often exhibit strong sexual dimorphism, differences in size, growth rate, prezygotic reproductive investment (Stark & McLetchie, 2006;Benassi et al, 2011;Horsley et al, 2011;Brzyski et al, 2014) and, possibly, in their ecological niche (Stark & McLetchie, 2006;Brzyski et al, 2014; but see Bisang et al, 2015). The distinct distribution patterns and different life-history traits among sexes of unisexual species suggest that male and female plants basically behave as distinct species, which might represent a strong selective pressure for the maintenance of unisexuality.…”
Section: Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This idea is somewhat weakened by theoretical models predicting that, if dispersal traits are plastic, an increase in dispersal rate, and hence, of spore production should be observed (Ronce et al 2005). Alternatively, recent evidence indicates that sex expression is under genetic control (Horsley, Stark & McLetchie 2011), raising the hypothesis that 'vegetative' ecotypes might be selected on islands.…”
Section: O I S L a N D B R Y O P H Y T E S L O S E D I S P E R S A mentioning
confidence: 99%