2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.10.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does the shelterwood method to regenerate oak forests affect acorn production and predation?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
21
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
21
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Aussenac (1957in Poleno and Vacek 2009) reports 8 full and 11 partial seed years in surroundings of Nancy, France over 106 years during 1865-1971 periods. Different and irregular fructification periodicity was also confirmed for other oak species both in Europe and in North America (Shaw 1968;Koenig et al 1994;Bellocq et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Aussenac (1957in Poleno and Vacek 2009) reports 8 full and 11 partial seed years in surroundings of Nancy, France over 106 years during 1865-1971 periods. Different and irregular fructification periodicity was also confirmed for other oak species both in Europe and in North America (Shaw 1968;Koenig et al 1994;Bellocq et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…At the same time, a crop over 10/m 2 was recorded by the authors below the closed canopy conditions three times during the studied period, and six times in the open. By contrast, Bellocq et al (2005) observed inconclusive differences in the production of red oak acorns on the control plot and on the plot with a 50% canopy reduction. Nevertheless, the crop was evaluated immediately after the implemented measure when the corresponding response of tree fructification could not yet be expected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, little is known about post-dispersal seed predation in Spanish black pine natural forest ecosystems. Changes in general patterns of post-dispersal seed predation are expected since the predation of these groups of animals may be very variable depending on seed production (Castro et al, 1999;Du et al, 2007), site characteristics (Hulme, 1997;Holt et al, 1995;Ostfeld et al, 1997;Christianini and Galetti, 2007) and forest stand conditions (Hulme, 1998;Bellocq et al, 2005;Christianini and Galetti, 2007;Pérez-Ramos and Marañon, 2008). Seed predation can also depend on masting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stand density affect microenvironment conditions such as surface soil temperature, soil moisture and atmospheric conditions (Dey and MacDonald, 2001), which may influence seed predators development and abundance, and thus post-dispersal seed predation (Bellocq et al, 2005). For example, Hulme (1998) found that ants foraged primarily in open microhabitats whereas rodents were least active in open microhabitats.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%