2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2017.03.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does the removal of Lantana camara influence eucalypt canopy health, soil nutrients and site occupancy of a despotic species?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Trees were most dense in uninvaded reforested areas, and least dense in areas that were previously and currently invaded by Lantana . The low density of the small size classes in invaded areas could be due to Lantana limiting seedling recruitment by competing for light, nutrients and space, as well as putative allelopathic effects (Gooden et al, 2009; Lambert et al, 2017; Prasad, 2012; Shackleton et al, 2017). The present study confirms the general suppressive effect of Lantana invasion on biodiversity and ecosystem functioning (Dobhal et al, 2011; Omeja et al, 2011; Ruwanza, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trees were most dense in uninvaded reforested areas, and least dense in areas that were previously and currently invaded by Lantana . The low density of the small size classes in invaded areas could be due to Lantana limiting seedling recruitment by competing for light, nutrients and space, as well as putative allelopathic effects (Gooden et al, 2009; Lambert et al, 2017; Prasad, 2012; Shackleton et al, 2017). The present study confirms the general suppressive effect of Lantana invasion on biodiversity and ecosystem functioning (Dobhal et al, 2011; Omeja et al, 2011; Ruwanza, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A crown condition assessment was conducted for each tree sampled. Crown condition assessments are a visual, groundbased scoring system for eucalypt crown dieback (Stone et al 1995) and have been shown to be a robust method for assessing crown health (Horton et al 2011) holding accuracy across seasonal canopy fluctuations (Lambert et al 2017). Trees were given scores out of five for each of crown size and shape, crown foliar density, dead branches, crown epicormic growth and foliar damage to determine crown condition.…”
Section: Canopy Condition Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Globally, Lantana removal experiments have been shown to promote native tree diversity and avian diversity (Lambert et al, 2016; Safari & Byarugaba, 2008). However, as Lantana is not the only factor shaping forest communities, successful restoration requires that Lantana removal should be accompanied with other suitable measures and long‐term monitoring of interactions is necessary (Lambert et al, 2017; Yeates & Schooler, 2011). Despite the numerous studies on the impacts of invasive species, only few have studied the impacts on diversity, vegetation structure, and soil properties in forests (Dobhal et al, 2011; Kumar et al, 2020; Sharma & Raghubanshi, 2009, 2010; Sundaram & Hiremath, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%