2015
DOI: 10.1002/hrm.21744
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does the Presence of Voice Imply the Absence of Silence? The Necessity to Consider Employees’ Affective Attachment and Job Engagement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
37
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The reluctance of public employees to speak up about organizational problems can have serious negative consequences (Morrison and Milliken ). At the organizational level, silence can diminish organizational performance by reducing the chance that errors are detected and rectified (Knoll and Redman ) and that serious ethical transgressions are prevented (Clapham and Cooper ). The inability of public employees to share ideas and provide inputs may also hinder innovation (Gambarotto and Camazo ) and positive organizational change (Argyris and Schon ) and stifle employee development and creativity (Knoll and Redman ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reluctance of public employees to speak up about organizational problems can have serious negative consequences (Morrison and Milliken ). At the organizational level, silence can diminish organizational performance by reducing the chance that errors are detected and rectified (Knoll and Redman ) and that serious ethical transgressions are prevented (Clapham and Cooper ). The inability of public employees to share ideas and provide inputs may also hinder innovation (Gambarotto and Camazo ) and positive organizational change (Argyris and Schon ) and stifle employee development and creativity (Knoll and Redman ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the organizational level, silence can diminish organizational performance by reducing the chance that errors are detected and rectified (Knoll and Redman ) and that serious ethical transgressions are prevented (Clapham and Cooper ). The inability of public employees to share ideas and provide inputs may also hinder innovation (Gambarotto and Camazo ) and positive organizational change (Argyris and Schon ) and stifle employee development and creativity (Knoll and Redman ). At the individual level, silence can reduce employee job satisfaction, increase cynicism and stress, and cause emotional exhaustion (Cortina and Magley ; Whiteside and Barclay ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Çalışanların, statükoya yapıcı bir şekilde karşı çıkan işle ilgili bilgi, fikir ve görüşlerini ifade etmeleri veya sessiz kalmaları bireysel ve örgütsel performansı, örgütsel öğrenmeyi, örgütün başarısını etkileyecek hataların ve yanlış yapılanların tespitini, işgören refahını ve paydaşları etkileyecektir (Knoll ve Redman, 2015;Morrison ve Milliken, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…to avoid embarrassment, to disguise minority sexual identity status). Of importance here is that the presence of ERG voice mechanisms does not necessarily imply the absence of silence (Brinsfield, 2012;Knoll & Redman, 2016). Related to this is evidence that while ERGs offer a voice mechanism that is linked to the opportunity of LGBT expatriation, the threat of stigmatization and stereotyping can fracture ERG voice and networks.…”
Section: Employee 'Silence' and Missing (Lgbt) Employee Voicesmentioning
confidence: 98%