2021
DOI: 10.3126/kumj.v19i2.49651
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does the Preoperative Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte Ratio and Platelet-to-lymphocyte Ratio Associate with Clinic-pathological Characteristics in Papillary Carcinoma of Thyroid

Abstract: Background Thyroid cancer is associated with local and systemic inflammatory activities. Many systemic inflammatory markers including the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) had shown credible and independent prognostic biomarkers in different malignant conditions. These markers are easy to reproduce, measure and inexpensive also. So, the preoperative evaluation of NLR and PLR is helpful in evaluating tumor growth and prognosis of papillary carcinoma of thyroid. Ob… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The optimal cut-off of NLR obtained by the ROC curve is in agreement with the other literature-reported cut-off of NLR to predict the aggressive disease, which varies between 2.11 and 2.5. [ 9 15 28 29 ] These studies have also reported the correlation between the NLR with the other prognostic factors such as lymph node positivity, tumor size, multifocality, extrathyroidal extension elevated Tg, and risk of recurrence. [ 15 28 29 30 31 32 ] Although we could not establish the statistical significance in this regard, the NLR did demonstrate a trend of association with several of these factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The optimal cut-off of NLR obtained by the ROC curve is in agreement with the other literature-reported cut-off of NLR to predict the aggressive disease, which varies between 2.11 and 2.5. [ 9 15 28 29 ] These studies have also reported the correlation between the NLR with the other prognostic factors such as lymph node positivity, tumor size, multifocality, extrathyroidal extension elevated Tg, and risk of recurrence. [ 15 28 29 30 31 32 ] Although we could not establish the statistical significance in this regard, the NLR did demonstrate a trend of association with several of these factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 9 15 28 29 ] These studies have also reported the correlation between the NLR with the other prognostic factors such as lymph node positivity, tumor size, multifocality, extrathyroidal extension elevated Tg, and risk of recurrence. [ 15 28 29 30 31 32 ] Although we could not establish the statistical significance in this regard, the NLR did demonstrate a trend of association with several of these factors. Interestingly, a few other studies have also reported the lack of correlation between the known risk factors and the NLR, despite the NLR being a predictor of prognosis in the same cohort.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been reported that NLR, PLR and MLR can have good sensitivity and accuracy in predicting lymph node metastasis in differentiated thyroid cancer ( 16 ). In addition, the increase of PLR is associated with lymph node metastasis ( 17 ).However, the correlation between blood immune indicators and conCLNM or contralateral medium central volume lymph node metastasis (conMVCLNM) in uPTC remains unclear. This study seeks to explore the relationship between the preoperative clinical features of uPTC patients with conCLNM or conMVCLNM to provide a basis for accurate diagnosis and personalized treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(In Russ.). DOI: 10.17650/2313-805X-2022-9-4-41-49 ВВЕдЕНИЕ Молекулярные маркеры и лабораторные параметры значимы в предсказании исхода заболевания, в том числе в отношении риска развития рецидивов опухолей щитовидной железы [1]. В настоящее время наблюдается недостаток точных и эффективных средств оценки дальнейшего развития заболевания.…”
unclassified