Does the physician order-entry system increase the revenue of a general hospital?

Park, Woong‐Sub; Kim, Joon S.; Chae, Young Moon; Yu, Simon C.H.; Kim, Chang-Yup; Kim, Sang-A; Jung, Sang Hyuk

doi:10.1016/s1386-5056(03)00056-x

Cited by 8 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, only 9 hospitals (21.43%) had adopted Electronic Medical Record. These systems fall into the category of transaction processing systems (TPS), which are focused on reducing the waiting time for outpatients and length of hospital stay, and increasing hospital revenues [2]. …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Adoption of Electronic Medical Records and Decision Support Systems in Korea

et al. 2011

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectivesTo examine the current status of hospital information systems (HIS), analyze the effects of Electronic Medical Records (EMR) and Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS) have upon hospital performance, and examine how management issues change over time according to various growth stages.MethodsData taken from the 2010 survey on the HIS status and management issues for 44 tertiary hospitals and 2009 survey on hospital performance appraisal were used. A chi-square test was used to analyze the association between the EMR and CDSS characteristics. A t-test was used to analyze the effects of EMR and CDSS on hospital performance.ResultsHospital size and top management support were significantly associated with the adoption of EMR. Unlike the EMR results, however, only the standardization characteristic was significantly associated with CDSS adoption. Both EMR and CDSS were associated with the improvement of hospital performance. The EMR adoption rates and outsourcing consistently increased as the growth stage increased. The CDSS, Knowledge Management System, standardization, and user training adoption rates for Stage 3 hospitals were higher than those found for Stage 2 hospitals.ConclusionsBoth EMR and CDSS influenced the improvement of hospital performance. As hospitals advanced to Stage 3, i.e. have more experience with information systems, they adopted EMRs and realized the importance of each management issue.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Adoption of Electronic Medical Records and Decision Support Systems in Korea

et al. 2011

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…al. later studied 212 Korean general hospitals and showed that CPOE significantly increased revenues for both inpatient and outpatient practices [45]. Similar reports of successful CPOE implementations occurred in Canada [46] and Australia [5].…”

Section: A Brief History Of Cpoementioning

confidence: 76%

Care Provider Order Entry (CPOE): A Perspective on Factors Leading to Success or to Failure

Özdaş¹,

Miller²

2007

Yearb Med Inform

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

SummaryObjective: Authors provide a perspective on factors leading to successful care provider order entry (CPOE) implementations. Methods: Viewpoint of authors supported by background literature review. Results: Authors review both benefits and challenges related to CPOE implementation using three guiding principles: (1) a clinical approach to clinical systems, which claims that CPOE implementation is analogous to a "good" clinician delivering care to a patient; (2) a commitment to quality, which advocates that no compromises should be made in implementing system functionality and clinical system content -the highest objective for CPOE implementation is to provide better quality of care and increased safety for patients; (3) a commitment to fairness, as evidenced by respect for individuals and support of local autonomy, which advocates for minimizing disruptions to clinician-users' workflows, and adequate local control over CPOE system design and evolution, including clinical content management. Conclusions: Past experiences with CPOE implementation can inform future installation attempts. Sociocultural factors dominate in determining the success of implementation, and should govern technical factors.

show abstract

“…Although there have been isolated gains in the biomedical domain, [6][7][8] the diffusion of IT into the clinical research enterprise has been surprisingly slow. There are a number of reasons for the sluggish adoption, including poorly defined financial returns, 9,10 an insufficient level of expertise to implement and maintain information systems in health care, 9,11 and regulatory constraints on patient information privacy.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Reengineering Clinical Research with Informatics

Chung

Kukafka

Johnson

2006

Journal of Investigative Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The future success of the translational research spectrum depends on the clinical research enterprise's ability to break through the barriers that constrain its productivity. As more basic science discoveries emerge, our ability to effectively translate this knowledge into improved patient care rests squarely on the manner in which we answer clinical questions. Informatics--the science of effective information use--is poised to help advance the conduct of science. However, incorporating informatics into the enterprise comes with its own set of challenges. To harness the benefits of improved information use, it is important to first establish how information flows within research. A thoughtful implementation of informatics--one that factors in social and organizational nuances--will undoubtedly lead to a more efficient and effective clinical research enterprise.

show abstract

Does the physician order-entry system increase the revenue of a general hospital?

Cited by 8 publications

References 22 publications

The Adoption of Electronic Medical Records and Decision Support Systems in Korea

The Adoption of Electronic Medical Records and Decision Support Systems in Korea

Care Provider Order Entry (CPOE): A Perspective on Factors Leading to Success or to Failure

Reengineering Clinical Research with Informatics

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About