Does the location of enrichment material affect behavior and dirtiness in growing female pigs?

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate if female growing pigs spend similar amounts of time exploring a wooden stick as they do exploring enrichment material regardless of its proximity to the feeder. Forty-eight pigs aged 18 to 26 weeks allocated to 16 pens with three pigs per pen were studied. Fifty percent of the pens had a wooden stick beside the feeder, and the rest had a similar stick opposite to the feeder. Two observers assessed the pigs by means of scan and focal sampling. The pigs spent more time (p < .0001) exploring the wood during the first week than during the rest of the study (10.9% vs 3.6%). The pigs with the wood close to the feeder spent less (p = .0001) time resting (29.9%) and more (p < .0001) time exploring (6.3%) the wood than did pigs with the wood opposite to the feeder (32.4% and 2.5%, respectively). In conclusion, a wooden stick placed close to the feeder was associated with more exploratory behaviorcompared with a similar stick placed opposite to the feeder.

Update on Tail biting in pigs: An undesirable damaging behaviour

“…Object manipulation is affected by space, other enrichment materials offered to pigs, (Larsen et al, 2019;van de Weerd et al, 2009) and the position of it (Scott et al, 2009;Larsen et al, 2019;Dalmau et al, 2019). Object manipulation diminishes by time as pigs become habituated to them and as aging changes their choices (Trickett et al, 2009;van de Weerd et al, 2009;Dalmau et al, 2019) while the variation of enrichment materials does not seem to have a significant effect in reducing tail biting severity (Chou et al, 2019a). Cleanliness plays a role (Averos et al, 2010) but everyday cleaning or replacement doesn't seem to have an effect on attractiveness for short periods (Beaudoin et al, 2019).…”