2019
DOI: 10.1017/s0140525x18001942
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does the “incentive hope” hypothesis explain food-wasting behavior among humans? Yes and no

Abstract: In this commentary, we discuss how the “incentive hope” hypothesis explains differences in food-wasting behaviors among humans. We stress that the role of relevant ecological characteristics should be taken into consideration together with the incentive hope hypothesis: population mobility, animal domestication, and food-wasting visibility.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly to the previous factor, it is hard to point to specific determinants of planning behaviours as they are very complex—this study, however, showed its associations with Demographic and SES factors: being responsible for cooking in a household, gender and BMI.Sharing food with others—this factor is rarely described as a potential method to minimise food waste, although it has been acknowledged that people who want to minimize food wasting engage in food sharing (Schanes and Stagl, 2019). It has been hypothesized that food sharing cultural norms might serve as a strategy to avoid food wasting in small-scale societies (Misiak et al ., 2019) and that there might be a specific psychological tendency that favours sharing food over sharing other objects (Sorokowska et al. , 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly to the previous factor, it is hard to point to specific determinants of planning behaviours as they are very complex—this study, however, showed its associations with Demographic and SES factors: being responsible for cooking in a household, gender and BMI.Sharing food with others—this factor is rarely described as a potential method to minimise food waste, although it has been acknowledged that people who want to minimize food wasting engage in food sharing (Schanes and Stagl, 2019). It has been hypothesized that food sharing cultural norms might serve as a strategy to avoid food wasting in small-scale societies (Misiak et al ., 2019) and that there might be a specific psychological tendency that favours sharing food over sharing other objects (Sorokowska et al. , 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(4) Sharing food with others-this factor is rarely described as a potential method to minimise food waste, although it has been acknowledged that people who want to minimize food wasting engage in food sharing (Schanes and Stagl, 2019). It has been hypothesized that food sharing cultural norms might serve as a strategy to avoid food wasting in small-scale societies (Misiak et al, 2019) and that there might be a specific psychological tendency that favours sharing food over sharing other objects (Sorokowska et al, 2021). Yet, people living in industrialised western societies, in which the majority of studies on food waste is conducted, waste their food in households, where the visibility of this behaviour to other people is minimal (Quested et al, 2013).…”
Section: Theoretical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(4) Sharing food with others-this factor is rarely described as a potential method to minimise food waste, although it has been acknowledged that people who want to minimize food wasting engage in food sharing (Schanes & Stagl, 2019). It has been hypothesized that food sharing cultural norms might serve as a strategy to avoid food wasting in small-scale societies (Misiak et al, 2019) and that there might be a specific psychological tendency that favours sharing food over sharing other objects (Sorokowska et al, 2021). Yet, people living in industrialised western societies, in which the majority of studies on food waste is conducted, waste their food in the households, where the visibility of this behaviour to other people is minimal (Quested et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%