“…As bystander programming is relatively novel, evaluation research is still building a foundation, but some results seem roughly consistent across the wide variety of programs and illustrate the promise of this approach (DeGue et al., 2014; Labhardt, Holdsworth, Brown, & Douglas, 2017; Storer, Casey, & Todd, 2016). Reviews and meta‐analyses generally show moderate but significant positive effects on bystander knowledge and attitudes (including reduced rape myth acceptance, an important corollary of perpetration), efficacy, and intentions, especially among peer presenters (Evans, Burroughs, & Knowlden, 2019; Jouriles et al., 2018; Katz & Moore, 2013; Kettrey & Marx, 2019a, 2019b; Storer et al., 2016). Some studies also show small positive shifts in intervention behaviors, though these are often self‐reported and therefore may be due to social desirability/demand characteristics (Jouriles et al., 2018; Katz & Moore, 2013; Kettrey & Marx, 2019a, 2019b; Storer et al., 2016).…”