2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does the Frequency of Participation Change After Stroke and Is This Change Associated With the Subjective Experience of Participation?

Abstract: The frequency of participation decreased after a stroke, and this decrease was associated with participation restrictions experienced and satisfaction with participation. Resuming vocational activities and screening and, if applicable, treatment of depressive symptoms should be priorities in stroke rehabilitation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
49
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(61 reference statements)
11
49
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, perhaps the fact that they participated in the programme made them feel more satisfied with their participation level, even though it did not help them decrease their perceived restrictions and, subsequently, did not help them to participate more in other activities outside the programme. Another explanation is that people with ABI had already adjusted to leisure and social activities in the years before participating in the programme, since it is probably easier to adjust to these types of activities in comparison with vocational activities (Blömer et al, 2015). It is therefore possible that, after the programme, the frequency of participation and the amount of participation restrictions experienced had improved in vocational activities, but not in leisure and social activities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Second, perhaps the fact that they participated in the programme made them feel more satisfied with their participation level, even though it did not help them decrease their perceived restrictions and, subsequently, did not help them to participate more in other activities outside the programme. Another explanation is that people with ABI had already adjusted to leisure and social activities in the years before participating in the programme, since it is probably easier to adjust to these types of activities in comparison with vocational activities (Blömer et al, 2015). It is therefore possible that, after the programme, the frequency of participation and the amount of participation restrictions experienced had improved in vocational activities, but not in leisure and social activities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These problems often have a considerable impact on the lives of people with ABI and their families, as they interfere with many aspects of daily and social functioning (Wood & Rutterford, 2006). Even people with ABI who do not experience obvious physical consequences due to the brain injury, or those who are discharged from neurorehabilitation, may experience a range of psychosocial consequences once they return to their home environment and try to live an independent life within the full scope of societal participation (Blömer, van Mierlo, Visser-Meily, van Heugten, & Post, 2015;Scheenen et al, 2016;Tiersky et al, 2005;Visser-Meily, van Heugten, Schepers, & van den Bos, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparison of outcomes in volume, frequency and intensity of community-based ambulation is difficult. However, lower volume of community ambulation after stroke is implied by self-reported difficulty with returning to pre-stroke community ambulation (Robinson et al, 2011a;Lord and Rochester, 2008;van de Port et al, 2008;Lord et al, 2004) and reduced participation across all domains of life (Adamit et al, 2014;Blomer et al, 2014;van der Zee et al, 2013;Barclay-Goddard et al, 2012). Stroke survivors may reduce the frequency of community ambulation through a decrease in total trips into the community, as well as in the frequency of walking related activities during each community trip (Robinson et al, 2011a;Robinson et al, 2011b;Lord et al, 2004).…”
Section: Distancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both time spent out in the community and total trips per day were also considered a useful measure of engagement in community ambulation. It is known that frequency of participation behaviours and walking related activities in the community is reduced after stroke, and thus these measures were also included (Blomer et al, 2014;Robinson et al, 2011b).…”
Section: Measures Of Community Ambulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation