2013
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01322.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does the freedom of reader choice affect second language incidental vocabulary acquisition?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was because we aimed for the reading test to measure comprehension and not content memorization. However, incidental vocabulary learning was evaluated as a “by product” of reading [56, 57, 58, 59]).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was because we aimed for the reading test to measure comprehension and not content memorization. However, incidental vocabulary learning was evaluated as a “by product” of reading [56, 57, 58, 59]).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One helpful aspect of a readers' choice awards program is the creation of what Reynolds and Bai (2013) call "bounded choice" and Johnson and Blair (2003) call a "text set." Too much choice can be overwhelming to students, especially those who are reluctant or struggling readers (Lu & Gordon, 2008;Mohr, 2006).…”
Section: Readers' Choice Awards As Reading Incentive Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One fundamental way to motivate learners to read more, as the research suggested, was to ensure the learners' choice of reading materials (Reynolds & Bai, 2013). Another motivating way of encouraging the students was through having them read aloud.…”
Section: Pedagogical Implications and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%