2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2007.04.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does the five-factor model of personality relate to goal orientation?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
21
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
6
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Supporting this finding, Wang and Erdheim (2007) found that while extraversion is positively related to mastery approach goals and performance approach goals, neuroticism is positively linked to performance avoidance goals. In addition, Komarraju and Karau's (2005) study revealed significant relationships exist between personality traits and motivational factors.…”
Section: Relationship Between Pre-service Teachers' Personality and Amentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Supporting this finding, Wang and Erdheim (2007) found that while extraversion is positively related to mastery approach goals and performance approach goals, neuroticism is positively linked to performance avoidance goals. In addition, Komarraju and Karau's (2005) study revealed significant relationships exist between personality traits and motivational factors.…”
Section: Relationship Between Pre-service Teachers' Personality and Amentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Agreeableness indicates the tendency of an individual to comply with other individuals (Robbins and Judge, 2013: 138). Individuals who get high scores from this dimension are polite, reliable, merciful, well-natured, tolerant, benevolent, easy-going, self-sacrificing, loving, thoughtful, friendly and collaborative people who get along with others and can easily adapt to changing conditions (Barrick and Mount, 1991: 4;Barrick, Mount and Judge, 2001: 11;Burger, 2006: 254;Wang andErdheim, 2007: 1495;Kumar and Bakhshi, 2010: 26). Individuals who get low scores from the agreeableness dimension have a distant, disharmonious, opposing, suspicious, critical, short-tempered, stingy, indifferent to others, egocentric, hostile and jealous structure (Wang andErdheim, 2007: 1495;Yazgan Inanc and Yerlikaya, 2013: 288;Robbins and Judge, 2013: 138).…”
Section: Personalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conscientious individuals attach greater importance to personal achievement (Barrick, Stewart, & Piotrowski, 2002), are more concerned about high quality of work (Moon, 2001), and are more motivated (Judge & Ilies, 2002), and are hard working (Barrick et al, 1993;Renn, Allen, & Huning, 2011). Accordingly, highly conscientious individuals very much value achievement-related conditions, such as a sense of accomplishment (Raja, Johns, & Ntalianis, 2004), and tend to spend effort to conquer the work-related problems that they encounter (Wang & Erdheim, 2007;Watson, Clark, & Harkness, 1994). Thus, when experiencing challenge stressors that are beneficial to achievement, highly conscientious individuals would allocate more resources (e.g., spending more time and energy) they have into dealing with these stressors, in order to meet the performance requirements and gain the sense of accomplishment, thus leading to better performance.…”
Section: The Moderating Role Of Conscientiousnessmentioning
confidence: 99%