2011
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1906045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does the Enron Case Study Provide Valuable Lessons in the Early Detection of Corporate Fraud & Failure?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To avoid such failure of detection, the models for detecting earnings management and corporate failures should be used concurrently by the stakeholders especially auditors, watchdog institutions, financial analysis, etc. The authors of this study also agree with Tebogo (2011) that the model of detecting earnings management should be used before using the model for detecting corporate failure. Because the failure detection model will not work very well when the financial information is manipulated.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…To avoid such failure of detection, the models for detecting earnings management and corporate failures should be used concurrently by the stakeholders especially auditors, watchdog institutions, financial analysis, etc. The authors of this study also agree with Tebogo (2011) that the model of detecting earnings management should be used before using the model for detecting corporate failure. Because the failure detection model will not work very well when the financial information is manipulated.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The pressure motive arises when companies or individuals face circumstances that compel them to commit fraud such as financial constraints or the need to meet expectations that are placed upon them. Drawing on the case of fraud perpetrated by Enron, we observe that the company manipulated its profits to maintain a favorable financial performance, meeting the shareholders' expectations (Tebogo 2011). Consequently, investors' aspirations and their anticipations of positive outcomes from the company exerted pressure on its management to engage in fraudulent activities.…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 98%