2002
DOI: 10.1007/s12108-002-1014-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does the death of the sociology of deviance claim make sense?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In his controversial, and misled (see Goode 2002), book The Sociology of Deviance: An Obituary, Sumner (1994) claimed the sociology of deviance is ''dead'' because it is no longer a viable or vital field; however, the growth of the Internet clearly presents critical avenues for the sociologists who study deviance. Because new forms of deviance (e.g., cyberstalking and cyberbullying) are constantly emerging due to the Internet, deviance will remain a lively and pertinent research topic (Durkin et al 2006;Konty 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In his controversial, and misled (see Goode 2002), book The Sociology of Deviance: An Obituary, Sumner (1994) claimed the sociology of deviance is ''dead'' because it is no longer a viable or vital field; however, the growth of the Internet clearly presents critical avenues for the sociologists who study deviance. Because new forms of deviance (e.g., cyberstalking and cyberbullying) are constantly emerging due to the Internet, deviance will remain a lively and pertinent research topic (Durkin et al 2006;Konty 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, Miller et al found that, during the 1990s, most citations in works on deviance are to writings by scholars who are known outside the field of deviance (many are criminologists), and that the most often cited works in the deviance literature are not recent. I address their points in another publication (Goode 2002), but at least reading their article gave me a clearer idea of what might be meant by the claim I found so wrongheaded.…”
Section: One Sociologist's Reaction To the Claimmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Young discusses the rise and general significance of new deviancy theory, which is still being hotly debated today (Sumner, 1994;Goode, 2002;Miller et al, 2001). Although generally sympathetic toward the theory's rejection of positivist criminology and conservative thinking, Young criticizes it as 'an alternative position which is merely an inversion of the opponent's ' (1975: p. 63).…”
Section: Ideological Trends and Sociology's Treatment Of The Victimmentioning
confidence: 99%