2005
DOI: 10.1080/13668250500349359
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does the daily choice making of adults with intellectual disability meet the normalisation principle?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
1
5

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
11
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…This is somewhat surprising because the purpose of DAs and group homes is to offer meaningful activities and social community, and facilitate participation in public life. However, the results are in line with international research (Bigby and Fyffe, ; Buttimer and Tierney, ; Forrester‐Jones, Carpenter and Coolen‐Schrijner et al., ; Hall and Hewson, ; Smith, Morgan and Davidson, ). Furthermore, research has shown that intellectually disabled persons were dependent on the staff's decisions regarding daily activities and that the staff mostly reproduced social structures (Widerlund, ).…”
Section: Background: Technology and Participationsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…This is somewhat surprising because the purpose of DAs and group homes is to offer meaningful activities and social community, and facilitate participation in public life. However, the results are in line with international research (Bigby and Fyffe, ; Buttimer and Tierney, ; Forrester‐Jones, Carpenter and Coolen‐Schrijner et al., ; Hall and Hewson, ; Smith, Morgan and Davidson, ). Furthermore, research has shown that intellectually disabled persons were dependent on the staff's decisions regarding daily activities and that the staff mostly reproduced social structures (Widerlund, ).…”
Section: Background: Technology and Participationsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The goal is that all people with ID should have the same possibilities to make choices as people without ID. Because people with ID are a highly heterogeneous group, Burton Smith, Morgan and Davidson (2005) state that individuals with mild to moderate ID have almost the same possibilities to make choices as people without ID, whereas individuals with moderate to severe ID have more limited possibilities to make choices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But what happens to the individuals already attending adult day habilitation programs? Research has indicated that individuals with severe intellectual disability achieve fewer community integration outcomes than those individuals with milder or no disability (Smith, Morgan, & Davidson, 2005). Such individuals with severe disability often attend day habilitation programs, are residents in group homes and other communal residential arrangements, and have limited choice and limited self-determination.…”
Section: Please Scroll Down For Articlementioning
confidence: 96%