2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2004.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does the conduction velocity distribution change along the nerve?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to compensate the volume conductor effects arisen due to the experimental conditions, CAP signals were corrected by the spatial correction procedure as described by Dalkilic and Pehlivan (Dalkilic & Pehlivan, 2002b;Pehlivan et al, 2004). Then, the corrected CAP (cCAP) signals belonging to each nerve trunk were normalized (ncCAP) by choosing the area of cCAP of the first recording point as reference.…”
Section: Cap Correction and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to compensate the volume conductor effects arisen due to the experimental conditions, CAP signals were corrected by the spatial correction procedure as described by Dalkilic and Pehlivan (Dalkilic & Pehlivan, 2002b;Pehlivan et al, 2004). Then, the corrected CAP (cCAP) signals belonging to each nerve trunk were normalized (ncCAP) by choosing the area of cCAP of the first recording point as reference.…”
Section: Cap Correction and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because of the change in conductive properties of extracellular matrix between recording and reference electrode that is known as "volume conductor effect," but not because of the change in voltage source itself (Dalkilic & Pehlivan, 2002b). Compensating for the volume conductor effect by applying appropriate correction procedure yields corrected CAP (cCAP), which includes the changes only caused by conduction velocity dispersion (Pehlivan et al, 2004). Therefore, any additional change in cCAP pattern may be attributed to the pathology intrinsic to the nerve trunk itself.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While it is acknowledged that there is evidence that the threshold required to excite a nerve fiber is not a precise value but fluctuates over a small range, this study assumes a fixed value of stimulus current, dependent on nerve fiber size, for fiber recruitment [15]. It is further assumed that the CVD is invariant along the nerve although there is some evidence to the contrary [16]. A lin ear relationship between conduction velocity and fiber diameter is also assumed [17], although there is some evidence that pathological con ditions, such as disruption of the myelin, can result in this relationship becoming nonlinear [18].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be explained by thoughts on the CAP. Indeed, the sole consideration of volume conductor effect is not enough to reproduce conduction velocity distribution in sciatic nerve [32] , therefore because of numerous factors like fiber torsion, diameter inhomogeneity along one axon, among axons, and among optic nerve regions [33] , CAP interpretation cannot be too precise. Consequently it has to be expected that many interesting features about RON fibers are still to be discovered.…”
Section: A-currentmentioning
confidence: 99%