2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.02.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does the combination of two plant species improve removal efficiency in treatment wetlands?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
11
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…coli removal efficiencies whilst the polyculture system planted with warm and cool season Graminae species was more efficient in terms of dissolved organic compound removal. These results differed from those found by other authors [4446] who investigated monoculture and polyculture wetlands planted with a number of different plant species ( Canna indica L., Cyperus papyrus L., P . australis L., Phalaris arundinacea L., T .…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…coli removal efficiencies whilst the polyculture system planted with warm and cool season Graminae species was more efficient in terms of dissolved organic compound removal. These results differed from those found by other authors [4446] who investigated monoculture and polyculture wetlands planted with a number of different plant species ( Canna indica L., Cyperus papyrus L., P . australis L., Phalaris arundinacea L., T .…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in one experiment with two species, we showed that combining both species would not improve treatment efficiency for any pollutant taken individually; i.e., the best monoculture was always as efficient as or more efficient at removal than the combination of two plant species. However, combining both plant species represented the best trade‐off between overall high pollutant removal and low nitrate levels in the effluent (Rodriguez and Brisson ). These results raise the more general, yet understudied, question of how plant diversity may simultaneously affect several ecological functions, the so‐called “ecosystem multi‐functionality” (Hector and Bagchi , Gamfeldt et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, Rheault et al. , Rodriguez and Brisson ). Complementarity in resource uses between species may result in increased nutrient uptake and water treatment efficiency (Fraser et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In relation to this, Vymazal [13] describes the regular use of proliferative plants, such as those of the genera Typha, Scirpus, Phragmites, Juncus, and Eleocharis, which are usually planted as monocultures. Monocultures, especially of exotic invasive species, might represent a risk for the conservation of natural biodiversity of aquatic ecosystems downstream, but also misprizes the potential functional complementarity of combining the different plant species [14]. Moreover, some authors pointed out the suitability of using wild plant species for the treatment of effluents in constructed wetlands [15], an issue that had not been sufficiently addressed so far.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%