2011
DOI: 10.1080/13504851003705274
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does the Chilean government smooth taxes? A tax-smoothing model with revenue collection from a natural resource

Abstract: This article uses a present value test to examine whether the Chilean government has smoothed taxes optimally since 1973. An important portion of the Chilean government's revenue is the result of royalties it earns from the extraction of copper. An appropriate test for tax-smoothing therefore must recognize that this part of the government's revenue is not completely under its control. The results provide strong evidence for tax smoothing when royalties from copper are treated as not being under government con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
4
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The hypothesis that political instability is one of the possible causes of fiscal disarray is consistent with the conceptual framework developed by Pastén and Cover (2010, 2011and 2015 based on the political determinants of tax smoothing and tax tilting, which they believe explain government budget deficits. Under tax smoothing (equivalent to a sustainable and efficient fiscal deficit), in order to minimize the distortionary social cost of taxes, deficits are efficient if they are the result of a policy decision not to vary the tax rate in response to transitory fluctuations in government spending.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The hypothesis that political instability is one of the possible causes of fiscal disarray is consistent with the conceptual framework developed by Pastén and Cover (2010, 2011and 2015 based on the political determinants of tax smoothing and tax tilting, which they believe explain government budget deficits. Under tax smoothing (equivalent to a sustainable and efficient fiscal deficit), in order to minimize the distortionary social cost of taxes, deficits are efficient if they are the result of a policy decision not to vary the tax rate in response to transitory fluctuations in government spending.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The transmission mechanism is as follows: an increase in political instability, measured by the probability of losing power, increases the rate at which the government discounts future social costs; so, with tax tilting, a relatively more myopic fiscal government policy produces a trend toward higher fiscal deficits. Moreover, the authors show that the direction of causality is from politics (political instability) to deficits rather than the other way around (Pastén andCover, 2010 and2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…La hipótesis de que la inestabilidad política constituye una de las posibles causas del desarreglo fiscal es congruente con el marco conceptual elaborado por Pastén y Cover (2010, 2011y 2015 sobre la base de los determinantes políticos de suavizamiento de impuestos e inclinación impositiva (tax tilting), que, en su opinión, explican los déficits en los presupuestos gubernamentales. En un contexto de suavizamiento de impuestos -equivalente a un déficit fiscal sostenible y eficiente-, para minimizar el costo social distorsionador de los impuestos, un déficit resulta eficiente si es el resultado de una decisión de política de no modificar la tasa impositiva en respuesta a las fluctuaciones transitorias del gasto gubernamental.…”
Section: Gráficounclassified
“…El mecanismo de transmisión funciona de la siguiente manera: un incremento de la inestabilidad política, medido por la probabilidad de perder el poder, aumenta la tasa a la que el gobierno descuenta costos sociales futuros; es decir, en el caso de la inclinación impositiva, una política fiscal gubernamental relativamente más miope produce una tendencia hacia mayores déficits fiscales. Asimismo, los autores muestran que la relación causal va de la política (inestabilidad política) a los déficits, más que en el sentido inverso (Pastén y Cover, 2010y 2015.…”
Section: Gráficounclassified
“…Cashin et al (1998Cashin et al ( , 1999 test the TSH for India, Pakistan and Sri Lanka, respectively; they find that the TSH is rejected only in the case of Sri Lanka. The others impose unit root and cointegration by using government revenue and expenditure series to test the tax smoothing hypothesis (Strazicich, 2002;Adler, 2006;Thronton, 2009, 2011;Reitschuler, 2010;Pasten and Cover, 2011). Adler (2006), which tests the TSH for Sweden, finding that tax smoothing is rejected for the period 1970-1996 but not for 1952-1999.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%