2020
DOI: 10.1080/02699206.2020.1745285
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does the cerebellar sequential theory explain spoken language impairments? A literature review

Abstract: During the past decades, converging evidence from clinical, neuroimaging and neuroanatomical studies has demonstrated the key role of the cerebellum in the processing of non-motor aspects of language. Although more is known about the way in which the cerebellum participates in the mechanisms involved in written language, there is ambiguous information on its role in other aspects of language, such as in non-motor aspects of spoken language.Thus, to contribute additional insight into this important issue, in th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
(151 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The connections between the topographically organized cerebellar cortex and the association areas primarily in the frontal and parietal regions represent the neural substrates of the cerebellar non-motor functions. The cognitive deficit that emerges following cerebellar lesions is largely driven by the type of cognitive ability which is specifically supported by the cortical areas the damaged cerebellar region is connected to and which the cerebellum modulates by monitoring timing and synchronization [68,69] in order to ensure the adherence of the outcome to predictions. In the presence of a cerebellar lesion, the mismatch between prediction and performance is the basis for a "dysmetric" behavior [64], i.e., a core feature of the cerebellar cognitive impairment.…”
Section: Cerebellum and Basal Ganglia In Movement And Cognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The connections between the topographically organized cerebellar cortex and the association areas primarily in the frontal and parietal regions represent the neural substrates of the cerebellar non-motor functions. The cognitive deficit that emerges following cerebellar lesions is largely driven by the type of cognitive ability which is specifically supported by the cortical areas the damaged cerebellar region is connected to and which the cerebellum modulates by monitoring timing and synchronization [68,69] in order to ensure the adherence of the outcome to predictions. In the presence of a cerebellar lesion, the mismatch between prediction and performance is the basis for a "dysmetric" behavior [64], i.e., a core feature of the cerebellar cognitive impairment.…”
Section: Cerebellum and Basal Ganglia In Movement And Cognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The language network is unilaterally located on the right hemisphere, which corresponds with its contralateral left-hemispheric dominant position in the neocortex. The role of the cerebellum in grammatical and verbal processes is well established [ 59 ]. Although the language network is spatially close to the mentalizing network in the present analysis, the identification of an independent language function is in line with recent findings suggesting that although there might be some overlap between language and mentalizing at the group level, these networks can be distinguished [ 2 , 28 , 60 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cerebellar sequential functioning has been demonstrated to contribute to information processing in the sensorimotor system ( Tesche and Karhu, 2000 ; Doyon et al, 2002 ; Restuccia et al, 2007 ; Morgan et al, 2021 ) and for cognitive functions, such as visuospatial functions ( Molinari et al, 1997 ; Leggio et al, 1999 ), language ( Fabbro et al, 2000 ; Leggio et al, 2000 , 2011 ; Tedesco et al, 2011 ; Lupo et al, 2021a ), verbal working memory ( Silveri et al, 1998 ; Chiricozzi et al, 2008 ; Leggio et al, 2011 ; Sheu and Desmond, 2022 ) and script sequences ( Leggio et al, 2008 ; Molinari et al, 2008 ; Morgan et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%