1990
DOI: 10.1080/08351819009389333
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Does that mean ‘no'?”: Negotiating proto‐conversation in infant‐caregiver pairs∗

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Practising what she described as "culturally contexted conversation analysis" (p. 278), by combining ethnography and conversation analysis, Brun-Cottan considered the various technologies through which operators' interaction was mediated and accomplished, on the basis that "[n]either conversation analysis, nor our attentions to the participants' activities are confined to talk" (p. 294). Allowing for different forms of data and analytic method, we can also notice how embodiment features in single articles on areas to which later researchers would give increasing or more systematic attention-for example, on audience/recipient (Streeck, 1994), caregiving (Leppanen, 1998;Yingling, 1990), children's play (M. H. Sheldon, 1996), disability (C. Sweidel, 1991), facial expression (Chovil, 1991), instruction (Weeks, 1996), collaborative work (Ford, 1999;Kleifgen, 2001;, participation (Egbert, 1997;Rae, 2001), and structuring activity (Berducci, 2001). Lastly, in 1993 ROLSI presented an early 1980s interview with Erving Goffman (Verhoeven, 1993a(Verhoeven, , 1993b, covering some influences and characteristics of his studies and including his comment that "the dimensions or extensions of our gestural language, our gestural behavior, has not been mapped much" (Verhoeven, 1993b, pp.…”
Section: Significant Momentsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Practising what she described as "culturally contexted conversation analysis" (p. 278), by combining ethnography and conversation analysis, Brun-Cottan considered the various technologies through which operators' interaction was mediated and accomplished, on the basis that "[n]either conversation analysis, nor our attentions to the participants' activities are confined to talk" (p. 294). Allowing for different forms of data and analytic method, we can also notice how embodiment features in single articles on areas to which later researchers would give increasing or more systematic attention-for example, on audience/recipient (Streeck, 1994), caregiving (Leppanen, 1998;Yingling, 1990), children's play (M. H. Sheldon, 1996), disability (C. Sweidel, 1991), facial expression (Chovil, 1991), instruction (Weeks, 1996), collaborative work (Ford, 1999;Kleifgen, 2001;, participation (Egbert, 1997;Rae, 2001), and structuring activity (Berducci, 2001). Lastly, in 1993 ROLSI presented an early 1980s interview with Erving Goffman (Verhoeven, 1993a(Verhoeven, , 1993b, covering some influences and characteristics of his studies and including his comment that "the dimensions or extensions of our gestural language, our gestural behavior, has not been mapped much" (Verhoeven, 1993b, pp.…”
Section: Significant Momentsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The core idea of this digital method for assessing cognition in young children is the evaluation of an extent of shared intentionality (ShI) in dyads made by analyzing their protoconversation. This interaction modality occurs in child-adult interaction at the onset of cognition, during the period of development when children still lack communication skills ( Gopnik 1981 ; Trevarthen 1989 , 1998 ; Yingling 1990 ; Bråten et al 1998 ; Tomasello 2019 ). It appears before the age when the typical developmental trajectory predetermines communication.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is suggested that children acquire knowledge at the sensorimotor stage of development up to 8-9 months, as stated by Piaget, through protoconversations with their mothers [30,31] and shared intentionality [32]. Recent research [33] showed the ability of young children aged 18, 28, 31, and 33 months, indwelling with their mothers, to display the bond between unfamiliar sounds (numbers in an unfamiliar language) and the appropriate items without any sensory clues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%