2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.0269-8463.2004.00864.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does testis size track expected mating success in yellow dung flies?

Abstract: Summary 1.We quantitatively compare the fitness function linking male mating success in the field to body size and the allometric relationship linking testis length (estimating sperm production) to body size, both empirically derived, for the yellow dung fly Scathophaga stercoraria (Diptera: Scathophagidae). 2. We find that both relationships are similarly non-linear (quadratic) and increasing. The most parsimonious interpretation of this congruence is that the evolution of testis size (and hence sperm numbers… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Observational studies, such as ours, are better suited to the model selection than to null hypothesis testing [66][68]. All models were fitted with maximum likelihood implemented in the program R (ML, lm function; [65].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Observational studies, such as ours, are better suited to the model selection than to null hypothesis testing [66][68]. All models were fitted with maximum likelihood implemented in the program R (ML, lm function; [65].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such variation is often evident as variation in testis size, a trait that correlates positively with both sperm production and rate of transfer of sperm and ejaculate during insemination (Møller, 1988, 1989; Hosken & Ward, 2001). Species with higher mating rates are expected to have relatively large testes and produce more sperm, and the same relationship is expected among males within species (Blanckenhorn et al. , 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Traits that influence ejaculate production (and therefore potentially ejaculate size, sperm quantity, and sperm quality) have also been shown to exhibit considerable intraspecific variation (mammals: Gomendio et al 1998;Schulte-Hostedde and Millar 2004;Schulte-Hostedde et al 2003;Stockley et al 1994) (birds: Merilä and Sheldon Genetica (2008) 134:5-19 7 1999b) (fish: Neff et al 2003) (insects: Blanckenhorn et al 2004;Gage 1995;Hosken et al 2003a;Simmons et al 1999) (frogs: Hettyey and Roberts 2006), although only a handful of studies have investigated the adaptive basis of this variability with respect to competitive fertilization success. In this regard, studies of wild mammals have been instructive.…”
Section: Sperm Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%